PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Centurions]

I'm tired of Simon Jordan's constant negative comments, attack on Manchester City, and most recently on Pep for the asking to speed up the legal process.

I have listened to him more than once; he argues that Manchester City had previously been convicted in 2014 and paid a 60m fine, and thus, they have done it before, and that everyone was talking about City not cooperating with the investigations (he said it is a constant theme that every judge is accusing them for not cooperating).

Simon Jordan has one thing on his mind: City is guilty!!!!! He doesn't believe that everyone is innocent until proven guilty though he said so, and he pretends to be fair. In reality, he has already convicted City. Why does he take the other side's view about City not cooperating when they have said so many times that they have collaborated enough as per the law? Why would he take one side when he doesn't have all the information about the case? Leave it until the legal process is completed, and give your feedback on the final verdict.

Before every show they'll get together and decide what the 'story' is today and which side of the fence each will take and who will be most controversial today. This generates clicks and phone calls to pull in the revenue.

They don't give a scooby about facts or what they actually believe in reality. They're whores, pure and simple and will play the tart for anyone as long as they get paid.

Stop listening.

 

[Rory Bluelow]

Is this still the main charge.

Manchester City sponsorship 'covered' by Abu Dhabi government, not Etihad

A consultants’ report written for the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi stated that the Abu Dhabi government, not Etihad itself, was ‘covering’ the airline’s sponsorship of Manchester City in 2010

www.theguardian.com

City are owned by Mansour as a private investor. Any arrangement between Etihad and its national government has fuck all to do with City and is not in any way relevant.

 

[bennyboy]

No, and it never was because AD backing it's own state airline when it was pretty much just starting up (I think) isn't against FFP rules. Etihad sponsor us to get world wide coverage, where they get their money (as long as it doesn't come directly from SM) is immaterial and nobodies business.

Cheers.

 

[Sir peace frog]

i dont give a fuck what simon jordan says if i did i would have a look in the media thread or i fucking should have to do.

 

[BamberBridgeBlue]

I listened in for about 10 minutes to Simon Jordan today. Four days after our Premier League win and his piss is still boiling. It’s hilarious. Seriously, what do these clowns think is going to happen? Speed up a process and demote us to the Conference? As far as I can see these charges have already been bought by UEFA and judged on by CAS.

We’re living rent free in Jordans head. Amongst others. It’s fucking great!

 

[manimanc]

Even if they have, there is a 30-second delay button which ensures they always have the final word and can cut you off before anyone else realises.

I would love to take the twat on.

The thing is if you start telling truths and laying down the facts they will undoubtedly cut you off or say the phoneline isn't very good.
You're too good for that nobhead mate, I'd let him stew in his own juices, he's so clueless.

 

[hihosilva]

I'm tired of Simon Jordan's constant negative comments, attack on Manchester City, and most recently on Pep for the asking to speed up the legal process.

I have listened to him more than once; he argues that Manchester City had previously been convicted in 2014 and paid a 60m fine, and thus, they have done it before, and that everyone was talking about City not cooperating with the investigations (he said it is a constant theme that every judge is accusing them for not cooperating).

Simon Jordan has one thing on his mind: City is guilty!!!!! He doesn't believe that everyone is innocent until proven guilty though he said so, and he pretends to be fair. In reality, he has already convicted City. Why does he take the other side's view about City not cooperating when they have said so many times that they have collaborated enough as per the law? Why would he take one side when he doesn't have all the information about the case? Leave it until the legal process is completed, and give your feedback on the final verdict.

I listened to the show yesterday when Noel Gallagher was on. Gallagher answered questions for an hour & the only time Simon Jordan spoke was to ask about City's ffp charge. The guy has no doubt that we are guilty has an agenda to get the book thrown at us.

 

[wolviedinho]

Ahh thanks, I remember him mentioning Spurs in the presser but wasn't aware Levy pushed for it to move forward.

Fool needs to deal with his own issues

 

[waspish]

It really isn’t mate - calling in is exactly what they want, as that’s central to their ability to generate revenues (well - that and endless fucking gutter brush ads!)

Their entire reason for existence is to bait fans into calling in.

You call in, and all that tells them is their bait is working - so keep pushing the desperate array of washed up alcoholics, gambling addicts, wife beaters and assorted dregs of the footballing world who pass for their ‘presenters’ to carry on pumping more of the exactly the same content out.

The best thing to do is not turn that brainless shite on in the first place, then it doesn’t bother you at all that way!

Calling in don’t make them money it’s the listeners which is in the millions so advertisement will make them the money! They must have around max 4//5 callers on the Kim&jill show!

 

[Nicholas van Whatsisface]

Calling in don’t make them money it’s the listeners which is in the millions so advertisement will make them the money! They must have around max 4//5 callers on the Kim&jill show!

I didn’t say it made them money directly - I said it’s central to their ability to generate revenues.

That’s how they sell themselves to the companies who advertise with them - audience reach, based on listening figures and call-in rates as a measure of listener engagement.

You call in - you boost their engagement metrics - they make more money from advertising.

The shows with the highest listening figures and the highest number of people calling in are the ones they charge a premium to advertise on.

Why else do you think they’re constantly pleading with people to call in or get in touch?