PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Winchester]

I’ve had similar to that by scousers. Main one is we picked 2 judges & no other reason. The funny thing is those notions have been put in their head by the MSM.

Not the brightest ,the rags?

 

[cheekybids]

Not the brightest ,the rags?

Not much interaction with the rags, it’s the scousers all over Twitter.
My mates (Rags) know it’s bent & any failings are theirs. They knew it when they started singing “we do what we want.”

 

[cheekybids]

I think Pep definitely got told something along the lines of what Tolm said this afternoon. For him to say come on Premier League get a move on he knows we hold all the aces, he knows it.

And for that shithouse chairman of theirs to say he's washed his hands of it he has defo felt the heat from all directions, maybe the penny dropped when he watched Sheikh Mansour meeting Charlie and shaking his hand. I'm sure he was watching the TV thinking he looks familiar that chap, really familiar.......GULP!!!

He's shit his pants has that lad.

You’ve just won the title & everyone from City is on the piss & I mean everybody. Masters has just left the stadium after a chat with Khaldoon & Feran, your not telling me that there’s no stories told.

 

[halfcenturyup]

The recourse to law is on very narrow grounds, basically irregularity in the process.

This is what I don't understand.

Consider this. You are a member of a golf club. You are sleeping with the Chairman's wife. You make a minor infraction of the club's rules, but the Chairman puts you through a process, they find you broke the club's rules and fine you a million pounds.

What the legal experts on here seem to be saying is that, as long as the process was followed properly, you are fucked. No matter what evidence you have against the charge, no matter if the punishment is disproportionate, no matter who is judge and jury. As a legal "layman", I find it hard to believe that that really is the situation.

 

[Keeper!]

Witness statements, eg when the CEO and Chairman of Etihad Airways swore under oath in a Swiss court(CAS) that the sponsorship of MCFC by the airline had been fully authorised by him alone and that it had proved to be of excellent commercial value, in fact it had exceeded all of the airlines expectations. The court agreed his evidence was irrefutable.

Irrefutable evidence of value for money.

 

[paulchapo]

And we’ve not lost since.
So, not quite the effect they were undoubtedly hoping for.……

That's how fucking stupid they are, they don't know this clubs history ( Oh sorry we don't have any) 35 years of wunning fuck all while the scum were hoovering up all the trophies and taking the piss couldn't break us. Dropping to the third tier while the whole world mocked us couldn't break us. Remember that ginger twat Chris Evans doing that sketch on his show of a load of blokes in our kit getting into a lift and saying "Going down?" to huge laughter from his brain dead audience? All these things galvanised us and made us stronger. The more they kick us the stronger we get. I love the fact Pep gets it now. He's a very intelligent man and being a Catalan understands what it is to fight against the odds. I hope we do the treble and stick it to them even more.

 

[paulchapo]

In simplified terms......

 

[johnevans]

I reckon its the butler that did it

Yeah, it was the butler wot done it all right.. in the library (where we play home games, apparently..) with the oil rig..

It's a fair cop.. now then, can we get on with just playing the football?!

 

[give it to gordon]

In simplified terms......

Its already start with Newcastle, some clubs tried to stop the purchase, now doing something sponsorship from the same country as the owner. ( doesnt include American owners or companies )

 

[Keeper!]

In simplified terms......

Newcastle in the next couple of years will take our place as the club of hate, just like we took Chelsea's (Abramovich), we will become one of the accepted elite again just like Chelsea.

This is well worth a watch