PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Pontypool Blue]

He and his wife knew my parents and went out drinking together, they were nice people.

I'd get them to check their Credit card transactions and change all of their password pronto!

 

[Asa's left peg]

He and his wife knew my parents and went out drinking together, they were nice people.

In your defense, there are a couple of them. Forum rules don't apply this time.

 

[LongsightM13]

Can’t believe people are so quick to blame City for all this shit.
If you leave a window unlocked and someone comes in and steals stuff you may have been a bit careless but the scumbag that took advantage is a thieving ****.
Some of the biggest companies in the world have been hacked, the fault lies squarely with the hacker. “Self inflicted” …… fuck off

The law of the land says you cant be ‘a bit careless’ with other people’s personal data

‘Biggest cyber risk is complacency, not hackers’ - UK Information Commissioner issues warning as construction company fined £4.4 million

The UK Information Commissioner has warned that companies are leaving themselves open to cyber attack by ignoring crucial measures like updating software and training staff. The warning comes as the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) issued a fine of £4,400,000 to Interserve Group Ltd, a...

ico.org.uk

 

[Blue Pete]

Firstly the data breach/hacking has nothing to do with our finances so put it on a different thread if you must.

Secondly just because City didn't do enough to secure the data and (depending what it contained) would be subject to sanction by the ICO, doesn't stop Liverpool being guilty of the criminal offence of hacking.

 

[Xhavenjoe]

Interesting take on FFP.

Leeds Leicester and Burnley have written a joint letter to evertons prospective new owners, 777 Partners, that they intend to sue the club for £300m if they are found guilty of breaking Premier League spending rules

 

[dadnlad]

Interesting take on FFP.

Leeds Leicester and Burnley have written a joint letter to evertons prospective new owners, 777 Partners, that they intend to sue the club for £300m if they are found guilty of breaking Premier League spending rules

it's just another shit stirring journalist got it in for everton every artical he's written hasnt come true

 

[blue b4 the moon]

Interesting take on FFP.

Leeds Leicester and Burnley have written a joint letter to evertons prospective new owners, 777 Partners, that they intend to sue the club for £300m if they are found guilty of breaking Premier League spending rules

That'll be Leicester who in recent years have been dodgy as fuck with FFP and bankrupt too.

 

[halfcenturyup]

Interesting take on FFP.

Leeds Leicester and Burnley have written a joint letter to evertons prospective new owners, 777 Partners, that they intend to sue the club for £300m if they are found guilty of breaking Premier League spending rules

Calling bollocks on that one. Or if the story isn't bollocks, then surely they won't have any recourse to Everton? It's up to the PL how they enforce their rules, so if are they filing a complaint against anyone, it should be the PL?

 

[Centurions]

Interesting take on FFP.

Leeds Leicester and Burnley have written a joint letter to evertons prospective new owners, 777 Partners, that they intend to sue the club for £300m if they are found guilty of breaking Premier League spending rules

Yeah, I liked your post as that would be funny but I can't see it being true.

 

[Sheikh rattle and roll]

As a data controller, certainly. What we do know is that for a lengthy period, an existing users password was used to access data. Two rules that any data controller should have in place for their users:

1) change your password regularly.
2) dont let anyone else know your password.

We dont know exactly how 2 failed, but any 'data loss' would have been minimised if 1 had been followed.

Likely that City may have some culpability, however, other alternatives exist concerning how the PW obtained.
It could’ve been obtained by unlawful means !
Yes,actions at 1 would limit the damage.
But I assume,you or I don’t know enough facts to make a concrete judgment.