PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[wattle]

I am pretty sure we will be cleared of any wrong doing here.

However if I know one thing about our core fan base. We have never, ever, forgotten our roots, and those "Yo Yo Years" we older fans lived through. Tough skin fuckers we are. We know how to mobilize and deal with adversity.

A 2 League demotion and 20 point deduction would be turned in to "City On Tour" by our core fan Base and end up being a 2 year bender, fans hitting every boozer in the country. And enjoying every minute of it.

Tourists would be replaced by those that were priced out of the Stadium.

We would wear it all like a badge of honour.

What will be, will be, and we will still be there tomorrow in any worse case scenario.

Post of the day

 

[HypnoticBlue]

City need to stop pandering to these w4nkers, ban all media at the Etihad and surrounding, give them nowt, then sue every tosser who think it's fair game to slate us.
Then investigate every single organisation and team who have been the root cause of all this bullshit, stop f***** about with the 4rseholes.

 

[sir baconface]

I think we shud go all out spend whatever it costs and skull fuck these cunts and bring the whole thing down ,all them snakey clubs writin in gto get us banned,do some diggin on them and fuck them over too,im sick to death of these jelous self entitled shit bag clubs tryin to constantly tarnish our reputaion,we are a great club and our owners have been nothin short of superb for our great city,pumpin millions into infastructure,ive had enough of it,personally i think we are going to have a field day with the ivestigation,i just dont think our owners are stupid enough to put us in this prediciment,the owners say weve done nothin wrong and i stick by it,i do think its time we rearly hit back tho and sink the whole fuckin ship

Admirable sentiments, sir.

 

[mancityvstoke]

There could be tax implications if managers / players were receiving payments offshore for services in the UK and they weren't disclosed. But I doubt that happened. W

Because it's fucking obvious that if we are guilty of everything they say, whatever that actually is, we deserve to be punished. But it's more likely that not much will come of this, so people can't understand how a fan starts with the worst case scenario and not the more likely case given the strength of our management and their past performance. Hope that helps.

and suddenly turbo posting ...........

 

[Roachy]

The consequences for the losing party in this affair are nigh on cataclysmic. It seems the PL has gone all in and the initial thoughts would be that they have serious evidence of the alleged breaches. But this is City and we've been here before with UEFA. I just cannot believe we've been so slack or arrogant to behave like this, and the little snippets from the club today support my view. This is going to be a colossal showdown.

 

[Chi-town blues]

The world knew they have been working on this shit show for a while right after the previous shit show. Remember the rumor while ago that pl is looking at this case ? How do they fabricate such allegations and walk away untouched is beyond me.

Sue the fuckers

 

[Tricky_Trev]

What’s this government white paper on football governance? And why could it have been a catalyst for the PL charging us today of all days now it’s postponed?

PL don’t want football to be independently regulated, so they’re trying to show to the government there’s no need for it to be.

 

[argyle]

Similar, but stefans tweets are worrying me. Unless I’m just misinterpreting

He's been hysterically over the top because things aren't going so well at City since the World Cup. Acting like everything is terrible, Pep has fucked everything, Foden isn't injured etc. You get the idea.

However I thought he would be level headed with the legal stuff but he was the same this morning when he went worst case scenario and said we'll be relegated. That tweet was then gleefully used by Nick Harris in an article.

 

[Maly]

No!

This bold bit is complete invention on your part.

Manchester City’s Auditors and accountants have no business knowing about if Al-Jazira payed Mancini millions.

The Premier League however, does, because they need all remuneration including from related parties to be disclosed.


I’ve already explained this to you once today.

Not sure if I remember this correctly, but wasn’t he getting paid to be a consultant for Al-Jazira prior to his appointment City?

Also, why do the Prem need to know what other jobs or income streams any player of manager has?

Can you explain to me too please as I don’t believe you’re correct?

 

[halfcenturyup]

and suddenly turbo posting ...........

Sorry. Was going to make a point about possible tax consequences, but got side-tracked by a flapper. Most unlike me :(