PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Simon Jordan… wtf. He’s a failed businessman stealing a living masquerading as some sort of legal / accounting expert. The dick doesn’t know his arse from his elbow… he works for Talkshite and anyone who listens to him or who gives him a modicum of credibility only has themselves to blame.
He's a ****.
 
I think the Everton case demonstrates to me that the PL tribunal was clearly influenced by the PL in its decision. What with Richard Masters telling the tribunal what the decision should be and quelle surprise they hand out a 10 point penalty. What a joke! That is why City will quite rightly be looking at all options to challenge the process. The PL are a bunch of stooges working on behalf of clubs that are living in the past. When/if the tribunal actually gets to conduct the process it is likely to be a sham like UEFAs process. City, fight hard to the end. Do not give an inch! We are the lads who are playing to win!
Good post- my question/ concern is this however.
We knew that with the UEFA charges there was a clear path to an independent court i.e. CAS. However with the PL charges we know the IC with its PL stooges is not going to live up to its title “Independent”and more than likely come up with a sham punishment to appease the PL & cartel’s agenda. Therefore will we have a right of appeal through a normal court system or is the IC decision the end game. That’s my concern.
Should anyone with a legal background have any idea the path this likely follows please enlighten.
Cheers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bez
This isn’t a smoking gun. It’s not going to be used. It’s utterly irrelevant, bar passing time on a thread that is fast flowing despite having nothing new to actually discuss.
Never said it was. I was just correcting those that believed it to be City’s fault as they never cancelled the log in details of the scouts that left; which was completely incorrect. Not sure what your point is considering what I stated.
 
Never said it was. I was just correcting those that believed it to be City’s fault as they never cancelled the log in details of the scouts that left; which was completely incorrect. Not sure what your point is considering what I stated.
What was the point of posting it? I’d assumed you were highlighting it for people to read and get on the bandwagon of reopening the case.

I guess I was wrong. Sorry.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.