PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[M18CTID]

The collective wisdom of BMF appears to suggest there are 129 charges not 115 and these map into 6 issues. I've applied my personal assessment of percentage weight/magnitude below. There's no doubt Ethihad Airways is critical.

Etihad Airways 65%
Etisalat 15%
Aabar 5%
Fordham Image rights 5%
Mancini contract 5%
Non cooperation 5%

How the PL lawyers attempt to reverse the vindication of Ethihad at CAS is baffling. It will have to include irrefutable proof of perjury in the Swiss Court by at least three witnesses.

If the Etihad deal makes up as big a percentage as that then the PL really are beyond stupid. Primarily because of the CAS ruling but also because it's been in the public domain for years where the money came from, and it wasn't ADUG no matter how many times our accusers try and claim it is.

 

[bluemc]

 

[mike1923]

HERE WE GO

 

[HelloCity]

Good to see it’s leaking before it’s started.

 

[Norbiton]

Trial?

 

[bluemc]

Trial?

Trial by media, certainly!

 

[Blue Pete]

"The evidence before the court is incontrovertible there's no need for the jury to retire. In all my years of judging I have never heard before of someone more deserving of the full penalty of law."

 

[give it to gordon]

Doesnt the press/media saying City are guilty before the 'trial' break some rules or is that only in a court of law !

Seems to me the press/media are trying to influence the 'trial'

 

[bluemullet]

The Labour Party have fully supported the football independent regulator billView attachment 100069

Starmer is a huge football fan and an Arsenal season ticket holder IIRC.

 

[stonie]

so next autumn is the court date I hear with a verdict probably not till the end of the 24/25 season