If Nick Harris believes the 2014 punishment was for cooking the books he hasn’t been paying as much attention as he claims. And what kind of saddo boasts about being somebody’s guest before “calling them out”. Yes, I know he has issues but it’s hard to feel any sympathy
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Thats slander right there, its plain and its simpleIf, as his hoped, we are cleared then, yes, I think the club will take action against him.
Almost all journalists say alleged offences etc to give themselves an out.
He's flatly stating we've cooked the books and it's not the first time.
He's pinning everything on us being found guilty and if we're not he's fucked.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 11,968
If, as his hoped, we are cleared then, yes, I think the club will take action against him.
Almost all journalists say alleged offences etc to give themselves an out.
He's flatly stating we've cooked the books and it's not the first time.
He's pinning everything on us being found guilty and if we're not he's fucked.
When we are cleared, the club will be looking to move on and Harris will just be a crazy man howling at the moon.
Also, one man's cooking the books is another man's creative accountancy and there was some of that when UEFA FFP came in (the sales of intangible assets, for example). Let him howl. It will make him sound (even more) insane.
Libel, actually ;)Thats slander right there, its plain and its simple
Eric Hitchmough
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Mar 2015
- Messages
- 3,027
Even by his standards that’s pretty stunning, mainly because (most) of his tweets have deliberately just about stayed on the right side of the law to avoid litigation.Think its time City took this clown to court and forced a court decision of cease and desist upon him:
View attachment 104324
This is different and surely requires the immediate attention of our legal team??
Thats the one, my legalese is poor today lol
He did slander us on the Lineker-Shearer podcast recently though.
P
P
PPT
Guest
We’ll probably invite him as guest in the Tunnel club at the Burnley home game and have him on the pitch as speaker pre-match. Wouldn’t surprise me one jot.Even by his standards that’s pretty stunning, mainly because (most) of his tweets have deliberately just about stayed on the right side of the law to avoid litigation.
This is different and surely requires the immediate attention of our legal team??
When City are cleared, that is the time to stop radio shows and ‘reporters’ discussing it and allowing comment on it.
If that stops, the scrotes from other clubs can’t fan the flames. At that point the shite withers and dies.. apart from probably the mentally challenged on RAWK. However without a listening audience they will crawl back under their rocks.
If that stops, the scrotes from other clubs can’t fan the flames. At that point the shite withers and dies.. apart from probably the mentally challenged on RAWK. However without a listening audience they will crawl back under their rocks.
supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,846
Yeah, the single most frustrating thing I hear at the moment is the complaint that City have hired lawyers to defend themselves and they're doing a robust job and will get off on a technicality. No fucking shit they have, and if there are technicalities that let us off the hook then the charges aren't remotely as serious as have been claimed. The CAS reporting has set the groundwork for this, I think.
I wonder what technicalities they think we'll get off on? The fact they spelt Pep wrong or the fact they had no evidence to support their charges and what we presented was sufficient to dismiss them! I always laugh at Simon Jordan going on about how we should show this irrefutable evidence if we have it... I'm not sure many lawyers would advise their clients to publish evidence to joe public as opposed to at a trial/hearing where it can be discussed in the proper manner and taken in its rightful context.