PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[bluenova]

hunting for headline instead of letting him talk

Absolutely. And it looks like Stefan had thought of that, as I know he's had a bit of stick in the past for talking about what might happen.

To me, he successfully turned around the seriousness of any punishment, to show just how serious the accusations are, how high the bar would be for the PL, and how unlikely they are to be able to prove anything.

 

[norman]

Jordan is an utter tool

 

[Man_City_Loyal]

Its Martin Tyler ,it’s live

Will be available to listen later was in a teams meeting

 

[roach3]

Shouty Jim annoyed me more than Jordan
Constantly derailing the topic with media headlines.

 

[Scott mcfc]

Jordan tryin his best to not let him get his point accross,its plain an simple as steffen just said it,its not about just coming after man city ect,its all the other high rollers theyve also got to come after,its just not happening,the premier leauge are out of there depth in this one,theyve tried screwing us ,and city are backin themselfs majorly,

 

[CC1]

Jordan the twat interrupting him on a crucial point of being charged.

Yeah & when Stefan said that although a city fan he is speaking objectively- Jordan corrected him with the word subjectively - fortunately Stefan overruled him & repeated that as a lawyer he was trying to be objective

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

Jordan really does not like what Stefan Borson is saying, but he is smart enough not to go against somebody with much better and deeper insight in all things financial than him.
And Stefan think EPL doesn't have enough ground to prove anything. O boy, that day will be cataclysmic!

It's not a case of him not liking Borson, it's a case of him not liking what he has said for obvious reasons.

 

[Sky Blue]

Just watched on YouTube. Simon Jordan needs twatting into oblivion. Well done Stefan, you spoke well and calmly.

 

[eversince 76]

Jordan talked like an opposing fans that knows as much as I and everyone else know. Exactly what Stefan explained. Nowt!

 

[supercity88]

Well that has been a long time coming. It will not have worked (I'm still listening to hear Jordan completely belittle Stefan as a desperate City fan who "would say that"). But for the wider audience it might have helped understand things a little more clearly and show that Jordan knows fuck all on this matter and thinks non-cooperation means we have something to hide, when it's simply good advice to withhold things that you know will be viewed with bias or an agenda and save them until they'll be reviewed by a panel that is truly impartial.

If we'd have shared information with UEFA it is highly probable it would have been a) leaked and b) found to be insufficient/irrelevant or ultimately not enough to substantiate our innocence. CAS would have probably then determined that UEFA came to a sound decision based on the information they were provided.

It's been similar in this case. Withhold information until we get in front of an independent panel who can make a fair and impartial decision on the evidence.