PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[MillionMilesAway]

Much as I hate to say it, to be fair to Masters he didn't say anything about new information in a week, did he? That was the newspaper that had the Ceferin "exclusive".

No, he didn't, I made that point above.

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

I wonder how much this is costing the PL. I mean it stinks of a witch hunt the more time goes on, but this must be costing them a lot of money to do this.

 

[Matt Diablo]

Its all a load of tedious bollox I know that much. Jealous bitches need putting in ditches

 

[cheekybids]

I wonder how much this is costing the PL. I mean it stinks of a witch hunt the more time goes on, but this must be costing them a lot of money to do this.

I wonder which pot the money comes from, grassroots or the CEO golden handshake?

 

[Invisible Man's Bandage]

I wonder how much this is costing the PL. I mean it stinks of a witch hunt the more time goes on, but this must be costing them a lot of money to do this.

A lot more than it's costing us, that's for sure. As well as having a top legal team (like us) for the IC process they also have to pay for that IC panel and all the support staff for many months / years even. Then add on the cost of a supposed four year investigation.

Huge sums involved.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

Birmingham have signed a stadium naming rights deal with the company who own then.
Get ready for the outcry from united, Liverpool, spurs and arsenal as they are so against that sort of thing.

Leicester literally have won the league and failed FFP whilst having their stadium sponsored by their owners’ company and are held up as plucky underdogs.

None of the furore around FFP is about the actual rules, it’s just trying to cope with their teams’ stagnation and our success.

 

[Phil1]

Its all a load of tedious bollox I know that much. Jealous bitches need putting in ditches

It’s a bit darker than snitches get stitches but think it could take off.

 

[Ric]

Don’t you start French sticking your nose in

No knead for that.

 

[Ric]

Masters said he couldn’t say when the hearing would be, but it was progressing.

It was the Torygraph who claimed there would be major developments the following week regarding City. All that happened was the Ceferin quotes appeared in their publication.

I doubt that the Telegraph were referring to Ceferin's interview when they said there would be developments that week. Presume they were just misinformed. Tbh, I don't think we'll hear anything really regarding any developments until the decision has been made, whenever that will be.

 

[Dribble]

I doubt that the Telegraph were referring to Ceferin's interview when they said there would be developments that week. Presume they were just misinformed. Tbh, I don't think we'll hear anything really regarding any developments until the decision has been made, whenever that will be.

I suppose. Ceferin being the significant development was just an assumption that many made when nothing else of substance was revealed that week.

I wonder if the Torygraph have been challenged over a clarification since?