Written reasons why the points reduction was reduced. From the Red Shirts PL website. 61 pages.
In fairness they’ve only been a KC for 12 months ;)So the original commission made of of 2 KC and a financial expert got the verdict wrong on 2 legal matters
It’s a bit much that a simple decision was got so badly wrong by 2 people who would have taken a minimum of about 20 years to become a KC
Erm….I don't think this decision will have any real bearing on our case. Seen a few people express concern about the legal mistakes that have been made but I'm sure any similar errors against us will be ripped to shreds by our legal team. Besides, anything that undermines the credibility of the commission might not be a bad thing from our perspective.
I will bet all my money I have that our legal team have used phrases and words that masters has never even heard of, let alone spell.
We don't need to argue they don't know what they ate doing!It’s all intertwined.
Premier league
Commission/tribunal
Appeals Panel
Who pays for it all? How independent is it?
Either way, it looks very amateurish. You could argue they don’t know what they are doing.
I know someone who did it in just over 11!So the original commission made of of 2 KC and a financial expert got the verdict wrong on 2 legal matters
It’s a bit much that a simple decision was got so badly wrong by 2 people who would have taken a minimum of about 20 years to become a KC
Or if they insist that the time bar bollocks is relevant. Just ask any rag what did they think of Brian Robson acting as the rags ambassador in the far east. Aiding in the Selling English clubs, promising them players from the rags academy. Telling punters it's a lot cheaper to buy a team not already in the Premier League. Then when the team purchased gets promoted to the Prem, the new owner asset strips the club and leaves that club broke. Even purple nose was involved but only telephone conversations were heard. One of these punters was seen having a meal with him though.
How this hasn't been brought up before is astonishing.
This can all be seen on a Chanel 4 documentary program called "Dispatches" from 2011. Also article in the Telegraph by Luke Edwards 17th JULY 2011 at 11-00pm title " Brian Robson caught up in foreign ownership scandal"
I am hoping one of the brainy gang on here would know how to pursue this matter and get it out there.
Spot on ! The Dispatches team set up a "Sting" whereby they invented a Far Eastern Businessman supposedly interested in buying an English Football Team. He was introduced to a secretive organisation ( let's call it Doug and Dinsdale's "The Gang" ) who could introduce established English Football Clubs that were "for sale". If my memory serves me correctly I think Crystal Palace and Sheffield United ( amongst others ) were mentioned. The price being quoted was £20 Million .Or if they insist that the time bar bollocks is relevant. Just ask any rag what did they think of Brian Robson acting as the rags ambassador in the far east. Aiding in the Selling English clubs, promising them players from the rags academy. Telling punters it's a lot cheaper to buy a team not already in the Premier League. Then when the team purchased gets promoted to the Prem, the new owner asset strips the club and leaves that club broke. Even purple nose was involved but only telephone conversations were heard. One of these punters was seen having a meal with him though.
How this hasn't been brought up before is astonishing.
This can all be seen on a Chanel 4 documentary program called "Dispatches" from 2011. Also article in the Telegraph by Luke Edwards 17th JULY 2011 at 11-00pm title " Brian Robson caught up in foreign ownership scandal"
I am hoping one of the brainy gang on here would know how to pursue this matter and get it out there.
Could Everton now claim the whole approach ( avoiding use of the word process) of the PL is unsafe and irrespective of their admissions then all sanctions specifically those which impede on their results to date must be totally overturnedIirc, and I may not, I don't have the handbook to hand, you can appeal the IC decision on any grounds. Everton, however, accepted the breach, but contested the sanction.
There is a next process in front of a really independent tribunal where the arbitrators are chosen by both parties, like at CAS. I think this is the one that can only be activated on very limited grounds, one being an error of law.
Which is why I am surprised they used the "legal error" wording in the finding. They have set a precedent for legal errors on their very first case ....
Or this could all be bollocks. :)
What's interesting is it was adjudged that any breach of the P&S rule was deemed as substantial and therefore required a severe punishment. The rags F.F.P. breaches however are deemed trivial and only a small fine is appropriate.That's the way I read it