PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Wow and you’re correct. In old money: 3 A4 pages @ 500 words per page. Repeat three per day each weekday and ongoing. I would guess an average hour a page start to finish if you’re a accomplished writer.
Fifteen articles, 45 pages of A4 a week. That’s some volume and basically full time hours on a treadmill.
Forgetting the £375 earned per week if all published- what quality of work could someone produce without inventing shit up or making assumptions or copying others.
I bet the final submission isn’t quality checked let alone fact checked.
Most probably use AI to write it for them these days!
 
Of course we're added for the click bait, we're the biggest name in the PL if not in world football. Any click bait article is missing out if they don't include us, actual facts don't concern them. I can't see why this would be news to any Blue.
You are missing the point still It’s a review of all the premier clubs not even with a negative city headline they could have used any figures for us seeing as they got them wrong and the affect would be the same from a click point of view. And if they thought they needed a negative slant they could have picked any negative figure but some how they got the figures completely wrong in a negative way with no apparent justification for why they got that figure and not a different figure
 
@projectriver I see Matt law is suddenly very concerned about Chelsea failing PSR today.

Hasn’t he been telling you that you’re wrong about Chelsea’s finance for the last 6 months?
 
It is in the Daily United, so a large pinch of salt comes with the post.

Football's spending rules are facing further scrutiny after it emerged that Leicester have dodged sanctions this season by claiming to be both a Premier League and an EFL club at the same time.

Mail Sport has learned that Leicester have not complied with the Premier League's new fast-track system for potential spending breaches this season despite being at risk of breaking their Profit and Sustainability rules [PSR] for 2022/23 as they were relegated at the end of that campaign, but also avoided being subjected to an EFL spending plan this year on the grounds that they were a top-flight club last season.

 
It is in the Daily United, so a large pinch of salt comes with the post.

Football's spending rules are facing further scrutiny after it emerged that Leicester have dodged sanctions this season by claiming to be both a Premier League and an EFL club at the same time.

Mail Sport has learned that Leicester have not complied with the Premier League's new fast-track system for potential spending breaches this season despite being at risk of breaking their Profit and Sustainability rules [PSR] for 2022/23 as they were relegated at the end of that campaign, but also avoided being subjected to an EFL spending plan this year on the grounds that they were a top-flight club last season.

I’m not sure they are exploiting a loophole.
If those are the rules that’s fine.
If the bent bastards who make the rules can’t get their act together it’s their fault- it’s not a loophole.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.