PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Alan Harper's Tash]

I hope every blue boycotts their overpriced shite.

They don’t even deliver to my postcode.

Even if they did, they were shite when I last had one!

 

[Bluesince1979]

I’ve just had a quick look at their feed and I’m not sure anything on there can be classed as witty or bantz.
Looks like it’s run by a 7 year old.

Sorry was being sarcastic

 

[r.soleofsalford]

I hope every blue boycotts their overpriced shite.

It is massively over price.

 

[mccity]

This serves as a handy warning if anything. City were probably well aware, but the club mustn't look too find any collaborative middle ground with the PL. The league has no interest in playing fair

 

[I'm Blue]

Sorry was being sarcastic

I’d guessed that.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Absolutely correct and clearly demonstrates that the PL are incapable of dealing with such issues due to their determination to preserve the total inequality and bias shown to the favoured clubs.

 

[I'm Blue]

Absolutely correct and clearly demonstrates that the PL are incapable of dealing with such issues due to their determination to preserve the total inequality and bias shown to the favoured clubs.

They forgot to mention us and 115.

 

[give it to gordon]

The pl is in a real mess letting the red tops +1 run the pl

 

[ganganvince]

Haven't bought anything in years from them, so overrated and overpriced!

Don't eat cheese so that's a no from me.

 

[JewelZee]

Haven't Forest failed the PSR by £35.0m? A figure that they could have received by accepting an offer for Brennan Johnson within the accounting period on which they have been assessed.

However by doing what was best for their club and holding out to eventually get £47.5m, therefore making more profit which presumably would mean they are in a better financial position to ensure their sustainability, they have failed the PSR rules.

And so are now deducted points which could impact on future revenues and make them less sustainable. How can the PSR be fit for purpose if they are penalising clubs for making decisions which are made in the best long term interest of the clubs?

Because it's NOT fit for purpose. It's a mind boggling bad idea. An abomination in terms of fair and reasonable business practices...