PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Gone for a Burton said:
This should involve the National Football Fans Association .

When was the last (or first) time they were involved in any meaningful matter ??

They should be explaining (simply),to supporters clubs and fans generally, the background,source,implications and solutions to relevant matters. If they can’t they shouldn’t be in ‘office’

Additionally, the NFSA should then be mobilising enlightened fans to take direct action against any offending body who are ruining and stealing the game from ‘the most important’ investors.....the fans !!

City are repetitively painted as the cause of most problems since the investment by HH Sheikh Mansour when the reality is totally different. It is this total misrepresentation that influences the thinking/responses of other fans ....a viscous circle of mis truths and negativity.

One day (not too soon) City may be thanked for their insights, actions and solutions that will change the face of football administration and management.

Manchester thanks you Sheikh Mansour.

DELICIOUS !!
Click to expand...
“A viscous circle…” Mansour will be tarred and feathered.
 
Mid Wales blue said:
Seriously, I think Sky has been very hands on, and influential, over the Premier League’s decisions over the last decade.

Sky stole football from the league, greasing many hands so they could create the Premier League. They then proceeded to build their whole sports package around the red three, plus Everton and Spurs (the original big 5).
Click to expand...
There was never really a big 5 in the 80s though IMO. From what I can deduce, that was a PR campaign bought and paid for by those very clubs. The original plan set in the late 80s, was obviously to create a legitimate big 5 in the PL era. Then it quickly became a big 3, when it eventually arrived. Spurs were a mid table club at best for the first decade and half of the PL era. Everton faired slightly better without really challenging much(how many title challenges, how many trophies in the PL era?).

It was a big two at best going into the PL era, Liverpool for the success(miles clear of everyone in major honours with 32 by the end of the 80s), United(15 m-h) for their attendances(have to give them that unfortunately).

Arsenal(16 m-h), Everton(14 m-h) and Spurs(14 m-h) had no legitimate claims to put themselves above the other traditional top clubs of old english football. There were too many clubs, too close to them to claim they were bigger. Wasn't there only 1 televised game a week for most of that era(Liverpool taking most of the limelight)?
 
Last edited:
GaudinoMotors said:
Had quick look at this organisation- looks the usual toothless, cap doffing, placatory, running alongside and not creating too many waves accessory.
Weasel words regurgitation.
Click to expand...
Revolution.

Let’s organise scrutiny of them and a campaign to remove the deadheads with an ‘action based’ group who truly understand the issues.

Notable BM commentators Dr Garry James & Prestwich Blue would be the sort of balanced intellectuals who could lead not mislead !!
KS55 said:
“A viscous circle…” Mansour will be tarred and feathered.
Click to expand...
I wondered who'd be first to spot it & comment.....you must be very busy today
 
Much like netspend spend comparisons ceased to be a talking point, as soon as it became clear it was making United look bad. I do feel it's worth pointing out, that the catchphrase 'whataboutery' seems to be a far less popular word recently.

We should be reminding every journo and pundit, who routinely used it as a free pass for their double standards, when it suited them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.