PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Has a conversation with a dipper fan who said he does not know how we are getting away with it lar. Forest, Everton Lar

I asked what point reduction would you give city based on what you know?

Long silence then ‘has to be 100 times what Everton , forest been given lar

So, how do you calculate that? Do you know the figure we overspent by?

No but it must be a lot lar

There isn’t a figure my scouse friend. The charges currently are not about how much we have over spent. Because the books say we havent

Then what are you being charged for lar?

Some random claiming to have hacked city’s email has implied the accountants have cooked the books.
What if we haven’t cooked the books. What would be our punishment?

But it’s 115 times lar

I give up
 
It has been made obvious from the time our owner bought City that we were simply not wanted with the new owner.
No change there.
Yu think? I always saw it as human rights didnt matter, buying the league, cheating accusations, all the shit (Including Sterling hate from the media) started happening when Pep joined, particularly AFTER he started beating the PL. 2015 onwards all the shit started flying asfaic.

Before that no one was bothered about state funding as much. Literally it is Peps performance in the PL that has irked so many journo's, fans, red top cartel.
 
Has a conversation with a dipper fan who said he does not know how we are getting away with it lar. Forest, Everton Lar

I asked what point reduction would you give city based on what you know?

Long silence then ‘has to be 100 times what Everton , forest been given lar

So, how do you calculate that? Do you know the figure we overspent by?

No but it must be a lot lar

There isn’t a figure my scouse friend. The charges currently are not about how much we have over spent. Because the books say we havent

Then what are you being charged for lar?

Some random claiming to have hacked city’s email has implied the accountants have cooked the books.
What if we haven’t cooked the books. What would be our punishment?

But it’s 115 times lar

I give up
At which point I tell them it makes me glad that they are upset so much that they cry themselves to sleep. Shuts them up, or they continue crying. Idiots.
 
Yu think? I always saw it as human rights didnt matter, buying the league, cheating accusations, all the shit (Including Sterling hate from the media) started happening when Pep joined, particularly AFTER he started beating the PL. 2015 onwards all the shit started flying asfaic.

Before that no one was bothered about state funding as much. Literally it is Peps performance in the PL that has irked so many journo's, fans, red top cartel.
I think it was more a case of "how dare he join City" when they were all so convinced he'd be at the Rags or Dippers
 
Apprently he said that "because they have the wealthiest owners and it would become a two horse race". Tht's the level of delusion (and racism) that these clowns have. That Arabs treat football like a game of monopoly but with real money.
So... get City and Newcastle (and Chelsea) out of the way so it can go back to how it was before... (checks notes) a two horse race!?!
 
I think it was more a case of "how dare he join City" when they were all so convinced he'd be at the Rags or Dippers
The rage of him beating the PL with City! Yup, had it been utd no one would be talking about HR, cheats, City would have no accusations against them, and utd would be top of the world. Order.
 
That latest TS interview with Stefan seemed a bit different to previous ones. It came across a bit as though they tried to ambush him and rattle him by allowing phone calls.

As ever, he made everyone look stupid by sticking to facts and not fantasy.
He’s been an exceptional addition to that shitshow of a station since he started appearing.
I can't understand why he went on a 2nd time as it was near enough a repeat of the 1st, Stefan laughing a the wobbling waspberry and goldilocks thinking he was smart.

Stefan had him on toast from the off.
 
I can't understand why he went on a 2nd time as it was near enough a repeat of the 1st, Stefan laughing a the wobbling waspberry and goldilocks thinking he was smart.

Stefan had him on toast from the off.
Yep, sitting in the vicinity of the two cuntmeister generals once would leave me with a potential police charge.

More than once? There’d be no potential about it.
 
That had to be a fake site and a wind up. Only have rules that affect City and Newcastle lol
Actually the PL has tried hard to write rules specifically aimed at City.
- the new category of “associated” is aimed directly at us because our sponsorships from AbuDhabi companies are not related under IAS 24.
- the rules about groups are aimed at us.
They will fail of course because they are incompetent. They need to write a rule which catches Pep, Txiki and Soriano. I suggest they disbar anybody who has been employed by Barcelona. Alternatively they could do what they really want:
Rule 666: All Muslims will attract a 199 point deduction.
 
My WhatsApp group has lit up because of this Forest news, could any of you more intelligent people refute this?

The reason a lot of people think they are guilty is there were leaked documents which UEFA were given which showed there was false accounting (and I think City maybe even admitted to it?). But under UEFA's rules too much time had passed to charge them, whereas the Premier League doesn't have a time limit in its rules.
Pure fiction.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.