PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Holding my nose and watching the Scouse trophy lift on Sunday, the smug twat Masters was stood to the right of Alan Hansen who was to hand the trophy to van Dijk. As that exact moment approached, the camera quickly moved round a yard or two and Masters was completely out-of-shot when Hansen handed him the trophy. Fingers crossed it’s positive !
Can but hope.
 
Holding my nose and watching the Scouse trophy lift on Sunday, the smug twat Masters was stood to the right of Alan Hansen who was to hand the trophy to van Dijk. As that exact moment approached, the camera quickly moved round a yard or two and Masters was completely out-of-shot when Hansen handed him the trophy. Fingers crossed it’s positive !
Can but hope.
It is a disgrace he handed it over after last season.
The woman that handed it over last season should have done it.
 
It is a disgrace he handed it over after last season.
The woman that handed it over last season should have done it.

It’s a disgrace he’s still in his job and that the Premier League acts illegally to certain stakeholders on behalf of other stakeholders.
 
Tbh I thought that the charges would've affected our transfers more than they actually did. And this Summer, if we get Simmons + Gibbs-White + Reijnders instead of Wirtz I'll be more than happy.
 
When a tribunal takes an extended period to reach a verdict, it can indicate several things, including:

1. Complexity of the case: The case might involve complex legal or factual issues, requiring them to deliberate extensively.
2. Close decision: The evidence might be finely balanced, making it challenging for them to reach a unanimous decision.
3. Difficulty in interpreting evidence: The tribunal might be struggling to interpret or weigh the evidence presented, leading to prolonged deliberations.
4. Disagreement among them: There might be significant disagreement among them, requiring extended discussions to reach a consensus.
 
When a tribunal takes an extended period to reach a verdict, it can indicate several things, including:

1. Complexity of the case: The case might involve complex legal or factual issues, requiring them to deliberate extensively.
2. Close decision: The evidence might be finely balanced, making it challenging for them to reach a unanimous decision.
3. Difficulty in interpreting evidence: The tribunal might be struggling to interpret or weigh the evidence presented, leading to prolonged deliberations.
4. Disagreement among them: There might be significant disagreement among them, requiring extended discussions to reach a consensus.
Thanks for clearing that up.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top