PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

He’s a complete wanker , called City a “Frankenstein” club , and is of the opinion Villa are a lot bigger club than City- a club with one title win in 110 years , a club who have also been up and down the divisions including a spell in the old third division, hes just a walking 6ft penis wearing Joe 90 glasses.
That last sentence really made me laugh, brilliant.
 
Yes I used to get all excited every pre season reading the back of the MEN on all the top players Swales said we were going to sign. "Swales war chest to put City back on top" or some other such bollocks. We usually ended up with a few wasted has beens and some promising youngsters all the top clubs were after, but we had beaten them to their signature. Another mediocre season followed as a result lol.
So true Paul, I used to buy the Sunday People just for the football gossip transfers, I remember flying out to Spain with the Sunday edition and “saved” the sports section for the journey. I was so excited as I read Tony Coton was rumoured to be joining us, make that a double G&T Mrs H, I’m getting giddy :-).
 
He’s a complete wanker , called City a “Frankenstein” club , and is of the opinion Villa are a lot bigger club than City- a club with one title win in 110 years , a club who have also been up and down the divisions including a spell in the old third division, hes just a walking 6ft penis wearing Joe 90 glasses.
Circumcised or entire?
 
As an ex player why would you be aggrieved?
I'm not baiting, btw. Just interested in how you see the challenge.
Just watched it again to make sure… Guardiol had hit the ball before contact was made. The defender had eyes on the ball and was entitled to challenge for it. In my opinion it was nothing more than a playing incident by old rules. Seriously do not think that would have been considered for a penalty 25 years ago and maybe more recently than that.
 
Watching the media in general, I feel there is a clear reduction in talk about our “allegations”. Instead, perhaps, they focus on safer issues such as the goalie’s big “mistake” or Haaland’s “annoyance” at being subbed.
Is it coincidence? Am i imagining it???
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.