PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Silva Citizen said:
Just watched it again to make sure… Guardiol had hit the ball before contact was made. The defender had eyes on the ball and was entitled to challenge for it. In my opinion it was nothing more than a playing incident by old rules. Seriously do not think that would have been considered for a penalty 25 years ago and maybe more recently than that.
Click to expand...
I have just looked again: no pen. S.C. analysis above is correct.
 
Last edited:
Stoned Rose said:
Sorry mate but that video doesn’t show or prove a thing.
Click to expand...
Asside from Goldridge admitting he's received legal correspondence from City.
A Utd fan who finds Goldbridge an amusing arse told me about the confession - but no way was I watching all the rest of his and other's shit to find it!
 
Last edited:
Bluewonder said:
It was absolutely not a penalty in any way. They ran into each other after Gvardiol had attempted a pot shot from a cross. It was a ludicrously poor decision and smacked of a refereeing team that has never played the game.
Click to expand...

The simple answer to the Question is, Would Salah/Liverpool, Rashford/United, Saka/Arsenal get the pen, Fucking right they would, ( It's Modern Day Football ) The Wolves player was late and put Gvardiol in danger of a injury

Why they are all moaning is, that Nobody Wants City to win the title for the 4th time in a row
Check Out Arsenal Pen from Yesterday, That is cheating and diving ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.