I've written to Man City's media department asking them to challenge the report. Bearing in mind the BBC are supposed to be impartial, there should be a strong case for this article to be at least edited or even deleted.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
BlueRockape
Well-Known Member
Dick ; )Ffs. And I just paid them my TV licence as well!
Get a fire stick
Been happening for years.I have noticed that during major junctures in the season that the sports media tends to turn the heat up about FFP and City, hear we are at the pivotal moment of the season and the media space is flooded with City and FFP, most of it’s click bait and none of it tells anyone anything new I don’t think it’s a coincidence
It usually ends up with them getting egg on their faces
BringBackSwales
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 33,650
Largely for non-compliance with rules? I thought it was for non cooperation?Ffs. And I just paid them my TV licence as well!
Oystercatcher28
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2010
- Messages
- 7,348
- Location
- https://acton28.blog/
- Team supported
- CITY/Aberystwyth Town
Still need a license for a TV, computer or laptop... possibly a phone as it can receive TVDick ; )
Get a fire stick
BlueRockape
Well-Known Member
Sorry mate we don't have to put up with this shit in SpainStill need a license for a TV, computer or laptop... possibly a phone as it can receive TV
Pingu the Penguin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 7,795
I’ve just complained to the bbc making the same points and asking them to refer their article to BBC Verify for an opinion on its validityI've written to Man City's media department asking them to challenge the report. Bearing in mind the BBC are supposed to be impartial, there should be a strong case for this article to be at least edited or even deleted.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
It's full of mistakes and takes no account of what the CAS judgement said about lack of evidence. A disaster of an article. It is also totally out of context. There is no rationale to randomly publish this article other than to try and damage City. It will have been authorised by someone senior and you can only assume they have acted in bad faith. There is not a single source quoted in it and non of the allegations are even attributed to any source. Nothing is qualified and there is no attempt at balance. It is as if it has been written by a child.Tbh, without making an assessment on the whys and wherefores now, the questions are in the public domain, if clumsily expressed. I think it is just a poorly written article from someone in the sport's department who doesn't know what he is talking about. Why should he? The fault isn't with the guy writing it, it is with the editor who allows it to be published without a review by someone with a legal background and some knowledge of the case to ensure it meets some sort of standard. Especially on such a complicated and high profile issue.
Gordyola
Well-Known Member
Only if you watch live tv or use bbc iplayer You don’t need a license just because the device is capableStill need a license for a TV, computer or laptop... possibly a phone as it can receive TV
Bald fraud
Well-Known Member
Normally ends well for them doesn’t it! LolWe are in a title race every media outlet are trying to put us off