PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Talk Shite (Iknow, I know, I shouldn't) have just run a Scouse Kloppo love in, inviting comments from LFC fans on weather Kloppo is a PL legend or not.

Every bonehead who came on accused City of cheating, one stated, "City broke UEFA FFP 3 times" apparently which were the reasons Klopp only won 1 title.

Can they rely on proxys phoning in making statements indemnifying them from slanderous statements?
Yes.
 
Great posts i just want to add in 2014 Uefa made two mistakes, the first was using a hostile company to investigate, the second was using illegal rules, City threatened using the law and Bosman, with 20 clubs that year alone charged UEFA was in a sticky place, but they had an Ace, it is an invitational tournament, so a compromise was made.
In 2019 City did something clever, CAS is an arbitration service, they do not need proof, City threatened to use another if they did not use proof, thus ruining their good name, they had no choice hence only non compliance could be used.
City have done something similar with the 2023 case, making sure the panel knows their reputation will be ruined, should they find City guilty without proof, as City will go further.

Where do you get your weed mate?
 
If we get cleared of the alleged offences then surely his position becomes untenable and he has to resign or be removed by the clubs.
Apologies, I was meaning more of how any of the other clubs could be supporting the cartel clubs who are ruining the league.

Get Masters out, by all means, but not on behalf of those fuckers.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.