PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[argyle]

Didn’t know where else to put this. But I’m sure City won’t be best pleased by this…

Has nothing to do with City.

 

[eastmanc]

Yeah. Its not 115. This originated when the FA cocked up the official announcement and everyone ran with that number. Its actually 129/130 charges.

Anyone who has written anything, crowing about 115 charges can be disregarded as they haven't got a scooby. So thats pretty much everyone

Shh keep it under your hat.:-)

 

[Rammy Blue]

Has nothing to do with City.

Yes, it does, Barrada still on gardening leave from us too. Nothing we will get overly excited about but embarrassing for the scum all the same.

 

[Silva Citizen]

My fear is that as it's a quasi-court they'll find a way to make us quilty on some of the charges.

Just as UEFA initially did.

That’s my point.

 

[Didsbury Dave]

Has nothing to do with City.

It’s got plenty to do with us. If he’s doing his new job whilst on gardening leave he’s in breach of contract. At a bare minimum we don’t have to pay him.

 

[GaudinoMotors]

My fear is that as it's a quasi-court they'll find a way to make us quilty on some of the charges.

Just as UEFA initially did.

They'll patch something up.

 

[Jonas.shaffer]

Fuck off rag/dipper.

What a bizarre reply. Are you okay?

 

[LongsightM13]

It’s got plenty to do with us. If he’s doing his new job whilst on gardening leave he’s in breach of contract. At a bare minimum we don’t have to pay him.

Yep and from the date stamp of the email

 

[WRicko]

They
They gambled that Everton and Forest would absorb points deductions, unfortunately Luton or Burnley could muster enough so they would be tied up in more Litigation and legal costs.

How do you mean

 

[wolviedinho]

What a bizarre reply. Are you okay?

He is a moody ****. Don’t worry you are in a safe place now.

How would he know you are a rag anyway. Have you posted glory glory man ushited yet?-:)