PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules


Stefan or Colin should wait until he does it and then steal his traffic, with a thread detailing all the reasons it's wrong to say City were let off(he would fume). Since, UEFA having no evidence and thus no certainty(how could they without it?) on most of what they were alleging(claiming you're certain and being certain in a legal sense, are not the same thing), is not a let off. There were some time-barred charges but they showed no proof on those that would have made a difference. So you can't claim a let off on any of those either, given the pattern that was established on everything that wasn't time barred(which included the Etihad allegations), unless you know what proof was held back or not... And you don't IMO, you've seen no more than what's in the public domain, Magic Hat or Magic Nick, if you are indeed the same person.
 
Last edited:
The ownership of City is very small beer? The Sheik's reputation would hardly suffer other than within the English gutter media, however would our Government allow the relationship with our owner to be tarnished?
It would suffer huge damage as would his Nation, why do you think this has taken so long, so many lawyers and has been given huge press?

If we were to be found guilty on the main charges we are *ucked and will be looking for a new owner.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.