PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[eastmanc]

I don't know whether we like the pre Feb rules, but the objection we have raised regards the changes

I think you're right, we aren't at all keen on the pre February rule but it's the ammendment that has really pissed us off.

 

[cheekybids]

Look at Garry Cook he’s been in some important positions at places like Nike, City, UFC and currently at Birmingham City. He fell on his sword accidently copyingNedum Onuha’s mum into an email mocking her having cancer. People can be stupid with their communications within a business, if you don’t want it being used against you at some point in the future don’t document or record it in any shape or form. I wonder if there’s anything knocking around mocking the ethnicity of Mansour or Khaldoon from the Premier League or execs of other clubs?

My CEO was a top bloke but would send emails to our leadership team disparaging the overseas owner. The sly fucker who wanted his job had no problem ensuring they were seen. The CEO wasn’t daft he just thought he had everyone’s loyalty, he had all but 1 & that’s all it takes.

 

[cheekybids]

To damn us in the Court of public opinion.
To be fair they've been pretty good since the charges were laid, but since we won the PL they've been abysmal.
The question is why? Do they know they've lost?

Look at headlines leading upto the Prince Harry phone tapping case then consider the headlines when we won at CAS. It’s no accident.

 

[bobbyowenquiff]

My CEO was a top bloke but would send emails to our leadership team disparaging the overseas owner. The sly fucker who wanted his job had no problem ensuring they were seen. The CEO wasn’t daft he just thought he had everyone’s loyalty, he had all but 1 & that’s all it takes.

I worked with two senior Directors who were addicted to gambling and used company devices on work time and another who was an online sex addict! They all used texts and emails! This sort of thing is just the tip of a very large iceberg.

 

[tweety]

A guy I used to work with many years ago was sacked because of the websites he was looking at on work's time. Don't go looking for dwarf porn sites!

 

[JewelZee]

Just because the club didn't make a claim until February doesn't mean they don't want the whole thing thrown out. Has anyone who has seen the complaint confirmed it's just about the February changes?

The more of these rules that are binned the better IMO...

 

[cheekybids]

I worked with two senior Directors who were addicted to gambling and used company devices on work time and another who was an online sex addict! They all used texts and emails! This sort of thing is just the tip of a very large iceberg.

Do you work for the premier league……. Please ;)

 

[cheekybids]

A guy I used to work with many years ago was sacked because of the websites he was looking at on work's time. Don't go looking for dwarf porn sites!

Surely you wouldn’t get sacked for a little thing like that.

 

[Centurions]

This leak can only come from 1 of the 3 parties involved in this legal dispute.

IC: I don't think they are the source of this leak. It's highly unlikely to me and I wonder what they would gain from this leaking.

City: We have seen previously that City doesn't have the habit of leaking something to the press when there is an investigation going on. We saw the same pattern from City with UEFA, CAS and PL. And if we were to leak something then surely we would hand our news material to someone else, sure not to Matt Lawton (the massive ****) from The Times who with his buddy Matthew Syed and Martyn Ziegler consistently slagging us. And if we decide to leak something with a high magnitude then the obvious choice would be Martin Samuel or Simon Mullock. That's why I just don't see City leaking this.

Premier League: The usual suspect. I am certain that they are the source. As we have already seen in the past week from Matt Lawton's reports on our legal action against PL. Either PL is a direct source or PL made the arrangement via 3rd party like Arsenal. Either way, they are the source.

Now the question is what PL can achieve from this leak and what was their motivation...? I don't have the answer for that. Maybe someone can enlighten me.

As the document (possibly redacted) was passed to all 19 clubs directly by the PL why do you think the PL would do that themselves?

 

[silva_is_gold]

Hopefully the club already has information & want to see if its produced to the ic,
Wonder if that's why Dick Masters wernt invited to the Etihad on the final day,
Because we know he's a slimy twat & we have the evidence