PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Alan Harper's Tash]

I,J,K,L,M,N - 5 letters.

My favourite ever clue, courtesy of Araucaria a long time ago.

Spoiler: Answer

Water?

 

[Gorton_Tubster]

I'm not being funny but you have no idea what they've admitted, I have no idea what they've admitted. Some journalist has uncovered some paperwork that they suggest shows offshore payments. There's no way you can say that these two things are one and the same. So a one sentence answer dismissing my post without giving any proof or logical reason doesn't wash I'm afraid

It does with me tbh. I would much rather listen to his explanations than some of the idiots who pull him up on nonsensical arguments on twitter.

 

[BerkshireBlue]

Chelsea’s admitted breaches have been very well documented. The only question is whether the Cyprus Papers uncovered further such breaches. I have spoken to multiple journalists on this topic who know what Chelsea have admitted because Chelsea or other sources have told them.

Thanks for confirming they could be seperate things like I said

 

[BerkshireBlue]

First, your suggestion was “If they find an email or document suggesting we've co cered something up or paid something we shouldn't have done” limitation would not exist.

This has no relation to the carve outs to limitations. Of course, a process of evaluation of evidence would be required to be carried out by the panel to establish if such emails or documents give rise to the high bar of fraud or concealment.

So your analysis is beyond over simplified.

oversimplified but correct as you've mentioned exactly the same thing in your second paragraph

 

[slbsn]

oversimplified but correct as you've mentioned exactly the same thing in your second paragraph

Have no idea what you are saying but appears to say that your initial over simplification was therefore a misleading and partial answer?

 

[J.G.Blue.]

I think the tossers at Talkshite & a lot of the cretins in the Media have invented a new legal term for city,
"Guilty until proven Guilty"

 

[slbsn]

Thanks for confirming they could be seperate things like I said

You claimed we had no idea what they were. We do.

They have “admitted offshore payments”

They've not “admitted another accounting error but what that is no-one knows”.

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

I think the tossers at Talkshite & a lot of the cretins in the Media have invented a new legal term for city,
"Guilty until proven Guilty"

Or given their views even after the CAS verdict "Guilty even when proven innocent".

 

[oldius]

For football fans across the nation, a club is guilty until proven guilty, until it is their own club.

This is the great danger of playing out proceedings in the public arena. It is worse for us by virtue of our outstanding sporting success.

 

[BerkshireBlue]

Have no idea what you are saying but appears to say that your initial over simplification was therefore a misleading and partial answer?

I was trying to simplify it for people on here. Ultimately there will be no limitation period for any of the charges until the evidence is fully presented during the trial. If that evidence was not known to the PL before 6 years ago and is of strong enough high bar then we'll be found guilty no matter when the offense took place. All charges will be looked at in depth, there won't be any charge instantly ruled out due to limitation. That is just wishful thinking