Man_City_Loyal
Well-Known Member
because spurs would of finished 5th instead of 6th? :-D
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
because spurs would of finished 5th instead of 6th? :-D
spurs wouldnt finish 2nd in a one horse racebecause spurs would of finished 5th instead of 6th? :-D
Are the charges only up to 2018 and our case has been resolved by UEFA.I expect to see this now.
Stalemate is the likely outcome, what-ever the verdict. A tko followed by appeal. a legal firm's dream; more wishful thinking by the Prem presented as facts, such as possible expulsion, compo, titles being stripped, championships re-awarded, etc. Since it's inception, the prem has been run as a cartel, by and for three clubs, earning billions for murdoch through sky, and fortunes for the clubs. Allowing the home team to keep all the profits from a game automatically widens the rift between the cartel and the rest of football, as intended. In some ways, a super-league now seems less of a very bad idea, imho
Well they finished third in a two horse race when Leicester were given the league.spurs wouldnt finish 2nd in a one horse race
abu13
Well-Known Member
I feel the silence is quite telling, I have no doubt that something would have been leaked by now if we had lost the major charges. The more I look at this the more I cant see anything other than a loss for the PL.
blueparrot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 7 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 29,403
They probably won't have even started writing up their findings yet, will be nothing to leak. The lawyers on both sides might have an inkling how it's going but doubt anything more than that.I feel the silence is quite telling, I have no doubt that something would have been leaked by now if we had lost the major charges. The more I look at this the more I cant see anything other than a loss for the PL.
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
2009-18 imagine what they would uncover if they went back to the slur phallic and Redknapp eraAre the charges only up to 2018 and our case has been resolved by UEFA.
Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 16,271
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Facts don't matter. A simple headline "could Court be taken to court by Euro elite clubs" would do it.Are the charges only up to 2018 and our case has been resolved by UEFA.
Prophet of Doom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Mar 2007
- Messages
- 1,583
Except a Super League would be more of a cartel than the PL ( just with extra teams involved ).Stalemate is the likely outcome, what-ever the verdict. A tko followed by appeal. a legal firm's dream; more wishful thinking by the Prem presented as facts, such as possible expulsion, compo, titles being stripped, championships re-awarded, etc. Since it's inception, the prem has been run as a cartel, by and for three clubs, earning billions for murdoch through sky, and fortunes for the clubs. Allowing the home team to keep all the profits from a game automatically widens the rift between the cartel and the rest of football, as intended. In some ways, a super-league now seems less of a very bad idea, imho
I recall Real and Barca were due to get hundreds and millions extra from the get go so it would just be similar shit favouring the established elite.
Agree with your points in the 115 outcome though.