PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

I could have said that tbf , all the bollocks about the grass being too long and such were never sticking and were always getting dropped . It still comes down to the three big charges as it has all along
Not really. I highly doubt his source was referring to the grass being too long, etc. And as @ayrshire_blue points out in the post below mine, those initial mistakes were quickly ironed out by the PL.
 
I could have said that tbf , all the bollocks about the grass being too long and such were never sticking and were always getting dropped . It still comes down to the three big charges as it has all along

There was never ever a charge of the grass being too long. Initially when the charges were released, that was one of them, but only because they released the charge number from the wrong season's handbook, it was (fairly) quickly amended to clarify the correct charge - nothing to do with the grass.
 
So shouty man, aka foghorn Jim has quite recently been talking about bullying.
If the rumour is correct, that City have been cleared of all charges, will he be at the vanguard of hordes rushing to apologise for the blatant, media led, systemic bullying that has been taking place since...... well, forever?
I await his contrition with interest.

(N.B. The same applies to his co host)
Add that scrubby little twat Jeff bellend to that too . . .
 
Probably wishful thinking but could Pep's 2 year extension mean that the 115 case is dead and buried. Although not officially yet, maybe we know where the case is going.
You’d have to think that it would be difficult to imagine Pep signing an extension without having some idea of how the case was progressing.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.