Blue_Lightsaber
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Feb 2022
- Messages
- 2,613
- Team supported
- Man City
I would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide or any concerns he would take the 5th
Does the 5th even exist in the UK's constitution/ law?
I would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide or any concerns he would take the 5th
The 5th in a row? ;)I would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide or any concerns he would take the 5th
Just a turn of phrase mate, here it would probably be our legal team telling him to stay awayDoes the 5th even exist in the UK's constitution/ law?
I would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide we wouldn't have put him on our list of witnessesI would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide or any concerns he would take the 5th
ExactlyI would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide we wouldn't have put him on our list of witnesses
At CAS he testified by sworn letter that he had never paid for a sponsorship or ordered anyone to do so. My bet is this was his testimony again. Maybe in person.My thoughts.
It don't sound to good when the gaffer has to get involved
It sounds exceedingly good if the big man is brought in.My thoughts.
It don't sound to good when the gaffer has to get involved
The only interesting me is the 5th premier league title in a rowI would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide or any concerns he would take the 5th
Can just hear him nowI would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide we wouldn't have put him on our list of witnesses
This is The ultimate evidence that we have nothing to hide and is innocent. If we were guilty on some of The more servere charges there is no way he would testify. A cross examination of The owner, would be out of The question if we had any concern about The outcome.I would imagine if the gaffer had anything to hide or any concerns he would take the 5th