PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[calumdown]

That really wasn't what he was saying though. You wouldn't really say the hearing was over if an element (closing arguments) is still to be heard. The other part that is suspect in my view is that before November 1st the evidence element was done and dusted. What have they been doing for at least four weeks?

tolmie posts in good faith what he hears on his grapevine.

mostly it is correct,
never is it "obviously complete bollocks".

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

All I’m saying is based on someone hearing things second or third hand, and the absence of, as you say, specialist knowledge, and what I’ve previously posted, it’s not an unwarranted conclusion for any lay person to arrive at.

The poster implied @tolmie's hairdoo was bullshitting, whereas it’s more likely to have been lost in translation imo.

 

[Invisible Man's Bandage]

tolmie posts in good faith what he hears on his grapevine.

mostly it is correct,
never is it "obviously complete bollocks".

I never said that - it was a poster replying to my comment

 

[calumdown]

I never said that - it was a poster replying to my comment

i know you didn't say that.

That was obviously complete bollocks

 

[calumdown]

What have they been doing for at least four weeks?

what would you be doing if you earned vast amounts of money per hour?

 

[Invisible Man's Bandage]

what would you be doing if you earned vast amounts of money per hour?

Working to the agreed schedule so that all parties are available as required :)

My point / opinion is that it looks like the hearing hadn't finished weeks ago as inferred.

 

[calumdown]

My point / opinion is that it looks like the hearing hadn't finished weeks ago as inferred.

you've made your point.
labouring it isn't going to make it reality :)

 

[Invisible Man's Bandage]

you've made your point.
labouring it isn't going to make it reality :)

You seem to be irritated by it somehow....

 

[Prophet of Doom]

There may be perfectly valid reasons for that. It isn’t unusual for there to be a hiatus between the conclusion of the evidence and closing arguments. Four weeks isn’t unheard of if diaries get in the way.

it wouldn’t be 4 x weeks - it would be 6 x weeks from the 1st Nov to mid December.

Maybe there has been a 6 weeks hiatus before closing statements - but I doubt it.

We’ve now heard multiple rumours about the majority of charges being still born, the case not lasting anywhere near the booked time etc. all we know for sure is that closing statements are later than expected so I’m finding it hard to believe all those promising rumours over recent weeks.

Not sure my blood pressure can handle another few months of the stress of it.

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

it wouldn’t be 4 x weeks - it would be 6 x weeks from the 1st Nov to mid December.

Maybe there has been a 6 weeks hiatus before closing statements - but I doubt it.

We’ve now heard multiple rumours about the majority of charges being still born, the case not lasting anywhere near the booked time etc. all we know for sure is that closing statements are later than expected so I’m finding it hard to believe all those promising rumours over recent weeks.

Not sure my blood pressure can handle another few months of the stress of it.

Six weeks is a stretch tbf.

Why are you inclined to not believe any rumours other than when the closing arguments are?