Freighting that ANYONE in football now can't have banter without offending someone.
FFS what a sad society we are becoming when everything is so serious.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Freighting that ANYONE in football now can't have banter without offending someone.
FFS what a sad society we are becoming when everything is so serious.
This post is offensive to all ridiculously sensitive peeps. I expect plod will call on you to discuss your non crime insult.Freighting that ANYONE in football now can't have banter without offending someone.
FFS what a sad society we are becoming when everything is so serious.
The two are completely different things. The 300m investment will more than pay for itself, regardless. Particularly the hotel, f&b and office space.You make some superb and valid points but a 300m investment in infrastructure is it any different from investing in players the actual commodity of a football club?
If we don't spend this January and make a serious statement then I am genuinely worried about this case and the implications.
Players signed in January might not, plus they and their may need convincing. But as you say, needs do must.
I’d love it if he said that. There wouldn’t be much giggling going on though just gasps of shock!
Pep embargoed video nearly 20 mins long being amicable nice and accommodating media next day in papers writing negative shite about us and pep! Someone asked about slott saying 115 the rebuff of that and saying about being hacked and we could of got certain players if Liverpool didn't hack our club would got the headlines but we know this media would of spun it another way..
It car go on.Freighting that ANYONE in football now can't have banter without offending someone.
FFS what a sad society we are becoming when everything is so serious.
blue whippet
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 May 2021
- Messages
- 5,216
- Team supported
- City
Certainly regards Jamie Jackson.Bit far fetched to describe them as journalists
Classy Pep.
I disagree, I think the joke itself was shit.Good joke tbh, but anyone with a vested interest should stay away from those topics, professionalism and decorum dictate it.
Also time and place. If he made the joke to his mates in the pub and it was leaked? No issue at all. Doing it in a press conference going around the world in a position of authority? Ill advised.
It’s not worth prosecution or anger or anything, but he shouldn’t be making those kinds of jokes in my opinion.
Do you believe the club would have gone ahead with the expansion IF they thought there was a good chance of been found guilty?The two are completely different things. The 300m investment will more than pay for itself, regardless. Particularly the hotel, f&b and office space.
Players signed in January might not, plus they and their may need convincing. But as you say, needs do must.
If we were to be found guilty on the major charges I could not see our ownership model surviving and hence they would not be throwing 300m plus on the fire.
The reports in the last few days saying Pep was the one that called the lack of activity last summer and he has made an error in waiting to refresh the team maybe was more telling.
January is difficult to bring in top players but if any club is capable of doing so it's us.
I would be going to Bayer and making an offer for Wirtz than both club and player could not refuse.