PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Citizen of Legoland]

Excuse my ignorance but what are mala fides?

As Colin says above ...

Mala = bad
Fides = faith

 

[Keith Moon]

You really should not be giving credence to spurious claims from Pinto. As both myself and Stefan have pointed out, he would not have saved the best till last and anything he has produced is by definition less cogent than stuff which was rejected at CAS.

The problem is that neither you, I, nor Stefan knows if there is better evidence among the material that didn’t end up with Der Spiegel. Pinto was active after the articles were published. And as I’ve written before on this subject, the question remains whether it was actually Pinto who hacked City or if someone else used him to release the material.

 

[Scoobz3]

What was the content / nuances of these mala fides ?

 

[halfcenturyup]

In a civil case, it is generally possible to request files or documents from a governmental body, so it’s possible that the authorities provided additional information to the Premier League.

I give up.

 

[Tarzan41]

The scheme wasn't concealed, but there is talk in the leaked information about ADUG reimbursing Fordham (or Fordham's owners) for losses they incurred under the scheme. If those reimbursements weren't passed down to the club then there could be an argument that those expenses were excluded from the club's accounts to improve the club's FFP position, and were concealed from the PL until the information was leaked.

Speculation, but it may not be time limited in those circumstances.

Understood. Cheers

 

[Sheikh rattle and roll]

In a civil case, it is generally possible to request files or documents from a governmental body, so it’s possible that the authorities provided additional information to the Premier League. What happened in Portugal is that the authorities received the data but then kept it under wraps, which is why they also chose to share the data with other countries.

Our chairman who is an eminent businessman has stated he has irrefutable evidence that we are innocent
The main word is that paragraph is businessman
He knows what we have been charged with and what we have done
If he suspected we were in trouble he would do what businessmen do
Broker a deal not declare our innocence publicly
Simple really

 

[Inter Me Nan]

The problem is that neither you, I, nor Stefan knows if there is better evidence among the material that didn’t end up with Der Spiegel. Pinto was active after the articles were published. And as I’ve written before on this subject, the question remains whether it was actually Pinto who hacked City or if someone else used him to release the material.

You're either Nick Harris or Miguel Delaney. I can't make up my mind which yet but I still claim my £5.

 

[wattle]

You're either Nick Harris or Miguel Delaney. I can't make up my mind which yet but I still claim my £5.

Well 18 years and 3400 posts is SOME obsession if he’s not a City fan, so you might be into something

 

[KS55]

Excuse my ignorance but what are mala fides?

Bad faith. They are supposed to act with bona fides, good faith.

 

[KS55]

The problem is that neither you, I, nor Stefan knows if there is better evidence among the material that didn’t end up with Der Spiegel. Pinto was active after the articles were published. And as I’ve written before on this subject, the question remains whether it was actually Pinto who hacked City or if someone else used him to release the material.

Your argument presupposes that there is evidence, which you cannot know. There was none in his original leak. Why should there be some now?
12 times CAS told you “There is no evidence that….” A pretty damning comment on Pinto. Stop assuming there is now evidence in his material….or do you think CAS was wrong?!