PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[slbsn]

My point is that nobody in this thread knows whether it is true or not that the five hard drives he provided to the French and German authorities included additional information on City that, as Pinto claims, demonstrates criminal relevance. We can only guess.

There is nothing obviously relevant to either the German or French “authorities” (whatever those are) in any event in the activities of an English football club and company. And it’s all years old now anyway. But let’s say he did. So what - makes no difference to PL v MCFC.

 

[Barcon]

This thread is a perfect example of why I believe posters should be limited in the amount of posts they may make in a single thread.
Nobody likes a talker.

 

[mancity2012_eamo]

Exactly, if we're innocent we have nothing to fear.

Are you worried?

 

[slbsn]

What's relevant is what the Premier League potentially got from him before disclosure, and that we don’t know.

Merry Christmas

It’s not relevant. Why is it relevant? Anything they got from him (very doubtful it’s anything) would simply be subsumed into the body of exchanged documents and then those in the hearing bundle. You act like there is this secret set of Pinto docs that only the PL have. What you ignore is that if such relevant documents ever existed, City would likely have been compelled to disclose them anyway. But again, even if not from City, they will have been in play between the parties.

 

[bluwes]

What's relevant is what the Premier League potentially got from him before disclosure, and that we don’t know.

Merry Christmas

Do you not understand what disclosure means

 

[slbsn]

Fuck me, if the premier league got it off him before disclosure then surely they were duty bound to share it with City and their legal team during disclosure. Surely disclosure is not a a one way street. If it is a way one street it makes refuting the allegations so much harder as even our legal team are not playing with a full deck.

Can one of the more knowledgeable posters please let me know if my understanding is correct

They are duty bound. Both sides know exactly what documents form the documents in play in the hearing and work together in producing an agreed trial bundle of such documents.

 

[YaYa's Left Peg]

Why would I do that?

Have a guess.

 

[JewelZee]

If the Premier League has new evidence proving that our witnesses lied at CAS, we’re in deep water.

Put the pipe down fella...that stuff will fry your brain...

 

[Champions again in 2012]

They are duty bound. Both sides know exactly what documents form the documents in play in the hearing and work together in producing an agreed trial bundle of such documents.

Thank you, although I am now done replying to this broken record

 

[johnny crossan]

Thank you

and goodnight :-)