PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

This is true in all litigation - you'd focus on your strong claims and not dilute them with loads of noise from other matters. The PL chose a kitchen sink approach which I think is a mistake. But I don't think it necessarily signals that they expect to lose the serious ones. It really would be a strange move to pursue a case of this nature without confidence in the core of the case.
The non cooperation charges will recoup some of they’re cost

I’m still of the opinion. If they had a magic bullet, they’d have instantly fired it
 
2000 pages in 6 months. Result expected January/February? I’m predicted it topping out at 11k if the result isn’t appealed.

If it’s appealed fuck knows
 
To you and me, yes. Not sure it carries much weight in the hearing, though
it doesnt carry much weight in a legal hearing , you are correct but ask yourself this when you are arguing the semantics of the pl acting in bad faith then surely the whole thing is how it looks because bar any emails showing them expressly saying they are doing this for malicious reasons then acting in good or bad faith would be entirely subjective and when something is entirely subjective then the optics are quite important.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.