PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

As Stefan says, yes it would. Unless the PL has evidence that we're not aware of, the related party question is potentially the only chink in our armour as far as the AD sponsorships are concerned. But it's a very, very small one.

And for the cynic in me, it's yet more corroboration that this isn't about the PL acting independently of its shareholders, nobly trying to ensure there is a level financial playing field in accordance with its rules and regulations. It's about our competitors trying to nail us in any small way they can.
1 billion percent!!!
 
Why are they only just coming out with this now, when it's been said on here and by Martin Samuels for years? But we were told we were paranoid.

Because these rules are now hurting utd? Therefore, they’re setting the narrative that they don’t serve the purpose for which they were intended, and consequently, need to be removed.
 
Alot of heavy swallowing going on
854dda62f948857aabc7a6df7ef63079.jpg.gif
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.