PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[calumdown]

mild glitch nothing just need some greese inside the barring

 

[The Lightbowne Cowboy]

View attachment 142372

And you know what he said don't ya ?..

 

[CC1]

This is what popped up on my timeline

View attachment 142349

How come all these regional papers have the same theme all of a sudden? Surely something has been leaked?

 

[mancboy]

Simon appears to disagree City are confident

Once again stefan you have appeared on talkshite without calling simon jordan a floppy haired **** or dropkicking jim white you must have the patience of a saint

 

[Bodicoteblue]

As usual mate it's just click bait to appeal to the cartel followers, or put another way pure bollocks.

Just like the magic number 115 (or 130, depending on how optimistic you are) -‘ wow that’s a huge number therefore they must be guilty’ stuff, spread the word City are guilty as hell, then when it turns out otherwise, the howls of bribery, stuffed envelopes etc will reach a tidal wave. You know the drill - ‘they are guilty as hell and bought their way out of it’
Guilt by insinuation and innuendo.
As usual.

 

[dickie davies]

 

[give it to gordon]

View attachment 142378

Lol what the fuck is going on ??

 

[South Stand Balti]

Anyone who listened, did Jordan say why he didn't believe City were confident? As in did he give any reason for forming that opinion?

Stefan basically said there were signs that City are confident (re the 115). SJ said he didn't think City were "quite dancing in the aisles, yet." He did say he thought we may face some challenges (he did not mention appeals). By challenges, he meant that some of the tribunal findings may not have gone our way. He also said he did think we would be found guilty but the punishment would maybe not be that "far reaching." In short, my impression was he thinks we will be guilty of some of the minor items. That was my general feeling. SJ was not acting like a man sitting on news of a City downfall.

 

[citizen_maine]

Stefan basically said there were signs that City are confident (re the 115). SJ said he didn't think City were "quite dancing in the aisles, yet." He did say he thought we may face some challenges (he did not mention appeals). By challenges, he meant that some of the tribunal findings may not have gone our way. He also said he did think we would be found guilty but the punishment would maybe not be that "far reaching." In short, my impression was he thinks we will be guilty of some of the minor items. That was my general feeling. SJ was not acting like a man sitting on news of a City downfall.

so basically, he knows nothing and is guessing

 

[Betterdeedthan red]

View attachment 142378

Load of bollocks.
As you were blues