PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[Mad Eyed Screamer]

& Levy has already said I don’t know why Pep called him out. I haven’t heard @tolmie's hairdoo deny it….

Exactly!

 

[cheekybids]

All jokes apart, why and how have spurs got themselves into the Big Club Gang? Its bizarre!

It seems like an initiation test.

Personally I prefer the thought of Levy getting the shit kicked out of him by the Glazers, Kroenke & FSG for 30 seconds.

Blood in blood out

 

[SebastianBlue]

What's Spurs but a second hand emotion?

What’s Levy got to do with it?

 

[Shads]

Well yes, but if it wasn't presented to the investigation, could that be construed as non-cooperation with the investigation given that it was presented at CAS and presumably will be at the independent panel?

Otherwise I am struggling to see how a charge for non-cooperation could stick, given it appears the club have provided all the internal information that was asked for, even if it was after legal clarification.

Which is exactly why I am less convinced than many on here that we will take the failure to cooperate charge lying down this time.

 

[Shads]

So how do you assure impartiality and non-confirmation bias?

Most jury's won't be exposed to the level of reporting we already have, jurors are certainly weeded out in the States and profiled.

That’s down to the Chairman. For Employment Tribunals in the Uk there is usually a lawyer, someone from the Unions and an experienced Business Owner/CEO. It works as the view is balanced by an independent legal arbiter who will guide the issues of law.

 

[halfcenturyup]

Which is exactly why I am less convinced than many on here that we will take the failure to cooperate charge lying down this time.

Fairy Nuff. This is one of the areas where I am struggling to see exactly what the PL is charging the club with, and why ...... and, the more I think about it, how they are expecting a favourable outcome in any of them.

 

[Shads]

The question the panel will mainly be interested in would revolve around reality.

In other words is it realistic to think that a Man City manager would be paid more for an insignificant amount of work for another entity within the same ownership group than he received for in effect his full time job at a much higher level within world wide football . Or was it a way to disguise his true remuneration package.
I think you also have to throw into the equation it was, I think, Mancinis Italian company that issued the invoices

However that contract was in place, as I understand it prior to him even interviewing for the City job. Makes a mockery of your theory if I am Correct… which I usually am.

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

All jokes apart, why and how have spurs got themselves into the Big Club Gang? Its bizarre!

Levy now thinks he is a big dick being on the Exec board of the ECA.

 

[Bluesince1979]

Levy now thinks he is a big dick being on the Exec board of the ECA.

He looks a slimy twat

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

At the very least that sounds feasible (apart from the threats from Spurs !). Assuming the other clubs on the call were Liverpool, United and Arsenal, you have the prime movers with the Super League and therefore the most dissatisfied with the status quo…it may explain why Levy was personally called out at Pep’s presser (and why we’ve not heard a squeak from him in response or indeed since). I wondered what motivated the club to single him out like that.

I can tell you Chelsea new people are very much trying to have good relations with City.