PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

markstephenhickey said:
They are so blinded by hatred they cant see the wood from the trees.

When 10 000 leaked emails get compiled and presented in front of a neutral court, and the verdict is that there is no evidence owner funds were used disguised as sponsorship. You would think he would have the sense to maybe question the validity of the whole thing.

To be clinging to the charges that relate to us not answering the phone to be all you have at the end of it just makes him look ridiculous.

View attachment 75561
Click to expand...
He truly is one desperate ****!
 
markstephenhickey said:
They are so blinded by hatred they cant see the wood from the trees.

When 10 000 leaked emails get compiled and presented in front of a neutral court, and the verdict is that there is no evidence owner funds were used disguised as sponsorship. You would think he would have the sense to maybe question the validity of the whole thing.

To be clinging to the charges that relate to us not answering the phone to be all you have at the end of it just makes him look ridiculous.

View attachment 75561
Click to expand...
He's a horrible little bitch isn't he
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
Yep, I posted a while back in here that the charges are essentially the same to cover the rolling years of the supposed offences, and 95 per cent can already be dismissed.

The other five per cent is our only focus, but I don't know about this latest claim that it now boils down to one.

Sounds like a Chinese whisper being embellished around?
Click to expand...

First rule of Chinese whispers club - nobody talks about tiny whiskers grub…
 
A lot of verified journalist have been spouting nonsense from quite some time esp after the PL charges
Why City have not considered giving back to one of those - Nick Harris , Miguel Dalaney, Tebas and so on.

I just read a tweet from a guardian journalist which said it’s alright Arsenal drew to West Ham. They can’t win against this state sponsored 100 charges cheating team. Even when we are still on trial.

I guess when you don’t stop one, everyone piles on!
 
Metal Biker said:
Manchester City are truly a unique club.

According to our rivals we're a shit team who only have success because we have bought the best players. Are assured that money does not equal success yet are criticised for 'buying' trophies with oil money. And are so weak that they hope these charges stick as it's the only way to stop our continued success.
Click to expand...
Don’t forget, we don’t have fans. It’s all an illusion including this forum. Truly unique.
 
CC1 said:
as this is clearly libel - WHY don't the club sue him? It needs to be stopped
Click to expand...
Because, unfortunately, suing him would just expand his platform. And would allow his legal team to undertake what would likely to be very malicious discovery.
 
Great Kompany said:
A lot of verified journalist have been spouting nonsense from quite some time esp after the PL charges
Why City have not considered giving back to one of those - Nick Harris , Miguel Dalaney, Tebas and so on.

I just read a tweet from a guardian journalist which said it’s alright Arsenal drew to West Ham. They can’t win against this state sponsored 100 charges cheating team. Even when we are still on trial.

I guess when you don’t stop one, everyone piles on!
Click to expand...
Think they have mate from listening to Simon Jordon this morning, very complimentary about a our side and thinks we will win the treble ! But wasn't interesting in that but he then referred to him being disappointed with club for threataning those who disagree with them over other issues !!!! Very carefully worded the last bit !!!!
 
CC1 said:
as this is clearly libel - WHY don't the club sue him? It needs to be stopped
Click to expand...

Because he is welly known to be shouting at the moon levels of mentally ill and the optics of pursuing that are absolutely terrible.

Nobody with any credibility in the world of football of journalism give the guy a second thought, hence him being stuck with Delaney the no-mark.

Delaney used to be locked on to United because it got him attention, when they just laughed at him and ignored him he moved on to City and Newcastle as people constantly bite and feed his pathological need for attention…..
 
I suspect - and I don’t know for sure obviously - that we can’t sue yet as, theoretically, if we are found guilty then in the eyes of a libel court we WOULD HAVE cheated.

I also suspect that WHEN we are cleared certain newspaper owners (we wouldn’t sully ourselves dealing with monkeys when the organ grinders are available) will be privy to a few words in their shell-likes about future reporting.

I would hope so anyway.
 
lenno said:
Don’t forget, we don’t have fans. It’s all an illusion including this forum. Truly unique.
Click to expand...

And the contradiction to us not having any supporters, away fans turn up to a packed Etihad stadium and sing ‘where were you when you were shit’ I’m confused.
 
Jacko1956 said:
Think they have mate from listening to Simon Jordon this morning, very complimentary about a our side and thinks we will win the treble ! But wasn't interesting in that but he then referred to him being disappointed with club for threataning those who disagree with them over other issues !!!! Very carefully worded the last bit !!!!
Click to expand...
Now that's interesting actually. sounds like City have been proactive behind the scenes.
 
CC1 said:
It’s not the only incorrect statement in his tweet. So If we haven’t cheated & it’s damaging our brand - then yes. Ask Fox USA
Click to expand...
I thought we had been fined that amount in total from the 2014 UEFA settlement and the CAS ruling!
Although, I think some of the 2014 fine was returned as we complied with FFP in later seasons
 
  • Like
Reactions: CC1
CC1 said:
It’s not the only incorrect statement in his tweet. So If we haven’t cheated & it’s damaging our brand - then yes. Ask Fox USA
Click to expand...
Nearly everything in his tweet is twisted beyond reality. He always references things that happened to try to establish a basis of credibility but then describes them in skewed or entirely fictitious terms.

And he does that purposefully, as he knows anyone that can recognise he is misrepresenting the situation will already disagree or ignore him, whilst those who won’t notice will simply like and retweet based on their hatred.

It’s a shrewd strategy given there are far more people that hate us than love us or that have actually kept themselves educated on these matters.

TL;DR

He’s a desperate lying ****.


@Citizen of Legoland Harris is exactly the sort of person I was referring to in our badge discussion, for reference. I want to make clear I wasn’t lumping you in with the likes of him.
 
Some other gems from Nick Harris;-

www.dailymail.co.uk

Manchester City squad cost £1bn... but it would cost £311m to buy it

NICK HARRIS: Sheik Mansour has now spent around £1billion on his Manchester City dream, but if he put every player up for sale this summer he would only be able to recoup £311million in proceeds.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

www.dailymail.co.uk

Premier League TV money: Liverpool miss out on over £70m

Liverpool and Manchester United would have both received more than £70million extra in Premier League TV money had the cash been distributed based on audience.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

www.dailymail.co.uk

Dyke says it would be sad for City to win title with two Englishmen

For the purists and the patriots, there can be only one winner when the race for the Premier League crown reaches its climax just before 5pm on Sunday. And it will not be Manchester City.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top