PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

i Haven’t noticed this point anywhere, but say we are found guilty of deliberate inaccurate accounting by this tribunal and that is obviously commercial fraud on a grand scale. Then the next step would be a criminal case where only real evidence could be heard and judged on merit. After 4-5 years of investigation I doubt there is any so we’d likely win the criminal case as we’d be found innocent. So where would that leave the prem?
basically they will do us for non co operation again or something v minor, we’ll take a slap on the wrist and then onwards and upwards.
 
Fool's Mate is the fastest checkmate possible. In order for Fool's mate to be performed, White must move their g-pawn up two squares and their f-pawn up one or two squares in the first two consecutive moves.

City are long gone.
My Spuds season ticket holding country cousins are lapping it up. One sent me a message saying next year's derby will be against Oldham Athletic!

One's an accountant, & one's a computer analyst, but both are as dunce as fuck where football's concerned & I can't even be arsed explaining beyond the headlines what the true situation is.

I merely told them to connect the dots.

The government announce they're considering an independent football regulator, within hours the PL charge City.

The government announce they're setting up an independent football regulator, within hours the PL find Everton guilty.

I love my family, but for fuck's sake they're as thick as pig shit where the nuances of football are concerned.

OR perhaps they just couldn't give a shit, because a PL without City benefits Spuds. Probably a bit of both. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠⊙⁠_⁠ʖ⁠⊙⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.