Just had a looks. It’s hilarious
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
Matt Diablo
Well-Known Member
Pls do share some of the best bits. I would prefer to shit my bed than go on there . . .Just had a looks. It’s hilarious
The Stockport Iniesta
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Aug 2008
- Messages
- 9,912
How many candles have they cunts lit?Just had a looks. It’s hilarious
I’m still slightly ‘bow legged’ and never could play the guitar!!How do you know where he lived and what was in his house? Do the words “come round to my house and play with my Fenderstrat” mean anything to you?
chesterbells
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 23,353
Another one with a change of view
She’s definitely one who certainly needed to …
Prophet of Doom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Mar 2007
- Messages
- 1,599
Another one with a change of view
Funnily enough had just read that Rudd piece in today’s Times and thought it stuck to the facts which is unusual for her !
Oh no. The first requirement of a democracy is the Rule of Law, laid down by consent and applied equally to all. Consent is given by the population voting in a gov on their behalf. Requiring knowledge to get the vote means some people have not consented, a perfect recipe for chaos. Loonies will deliberately fail to qualify and then claim the law does not apply to them as they go about nefarious business.That's it in a nutshell. The fact that every opposition fan I could be arsed to engage with don't even know what we're charged with, but are certain to the last Higgs-Boson particle in their body that we're guilty, says it all.
The lot of em are braindead pricks of the highest order...
The worst thing is it shows what's wrong universal suffrage. I've long since held the view that before being allowed to vote, the electorate should individually demonstrate that they actually know who & what they're voting for.
I tend not to comment on things I've no knowledge on, but your average football fan thinks he can switch from the Daily Sport & Only Fans, to expertly comment on matters that would even flummox Economists reading the Financial Times.
I truly fuckin despair! ¯\_(⊙_ʖ⊙)_/¯
See the women’s suffrage movement and theories of extra parliamentary activity.
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,106
Oh no. The first requirement of a democracy is the Rule of Law, laid down by consent and applied equally to all. Consent is given by the population voting in a gov on their behalf. Requiring knowledge to get the vote means some people have not consented, a perfect recipe for chaos. Loonies will deliberately fail to qualify and then claim the law does not apply to them as they go about nefarious business.
See the women’s suffrage movement and theories of extra parliamentary activity.
I'm too stupid to understand all that. Can I vote please?
Eh? They’re the same thing - a binding set of rules which explicitly state what you can say (nothing) is an effective NDA.Confidentiality of disciplinary proceedings is set out in the PL rules. There is no NDA.
Which was my original point - Masters isn’t ’being coy’, he simply isn’t allowed to say anything.
burning blue soul
Well-Known Member
I read that book. A lot of words saying very little. They could have condensed it into a pamphlet.1st question-------------What is the "God Particle" known as ?