You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
The courts of public opinion is utterly and totally irrelevant.In the grand scheme of things it doesn't matter; thanks to our experts on here, Stefan included, I'm reasonably confident we will prevail and the PL will not be able to make the case against us.
In the court of public opinion it does matter.
blue for life
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 2,448
Jordan just talked over Stefan as per. He can’t help himself especially when faced with rational discussion. He had no intention of listening.
Disagree, for once he had the upper hand, if you have irrefutable proof you don't settle.Jordan just talked over Stefan as per. He can’t help himself especially when faced with rational discussion. He had no intention of listening.
I think Jordan had the upper hand in that debate today sadly. Whether what he was saying was right or wrong, he shouted out enough for the haters to have more ammo to throw at us.
Anyway, the main summary of today is that the cease and resist letters story seems to have been fake news
More ammo it's all the same ammo nothing has changed! We still waiting for the outcome and no knows how it will end? Apart from it's that serious an accusation that it's more than likely we don't get punished..
GortonBlue62
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Nov 2015
- Messages
- 3,060
You know that's not true.The courts of public opinion is utterly and totally irrelevant.
Everytime we have to explain about 'time barred' and 'armies of lawyers' and 'state owned' and '115 charges' etc. to a workmate or rival fan it becomes a little bit more difficult when we've just lost the latest round of the PR battle.
City Mike 1969
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2021
- Messages
- 637
- Location
- Manchester
- Team supported
- The one that doesn't just lie about coming from Manchester.
I don't have any problem with the way that Stefan represented himself - as many others have pointed out, he was there as a football finance professional, not as a defence counsel for the club. I do think though that he is basically setting himself up on a hiding to nothing by dealing with such an inferior quality, agenda driven media outlet.
wagonman
Well-Known Member
He who laughes last laughes loudest and longest...
JJ
JJ
Stefan booked in to discuss ffp on the day the forest appeal news broke.
Surely it's not right that talksport are being briefed on when the appeal outcome would be announced - and possibly what the outcome actually is.