PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[uweuweuwe]

Stone and Roan spent five years asking about "sportswashing" but that angle has been quietly dropped now it has become clear that "sportswashing" is just a fake slogan created by PR people trying to promote the campaigns of some human rights groups. The so-called 115 charges (which are essentially five broad allegations) are also a fake construct created by PR people acting for the PL in an attempt to damage City's reputation. What questions will they ask Pep when the trumped up charges are dismissed?

Funny how sportwashing was flung around for City, Newcastle and even british cycling for using shell as its sponsor but since scruffy Jim and his dodgy petro chemical company have bought into the rags Stone and Roan dont mention it anymore.

 

[KS55]

I guess TH believes, from his info, that 115 is a one sided verdict in our favour.

And possibly severe criticism of the PL and the Redshirts. When I mentioned this a while ago, Tolmie gave me a like. A clue?

 

[abu13]

I think its a little cute how they keep saying they start by saying "the only punishment the will find acceptable is" Like their opinion counts for anything.

Interesting that I have not seen a single post by any of their fans even considering that we may actually be innocent in all this.

 

[KS55]

In which case, the Pep presser would be him sitting in a room on his own as everybody from the media would be banned. Doesn't it occur to you that maybe the club want it the way it is?

Definitely possible. Pep replies “The club tell me we have done nothing wrong.” Perfect PR.

 

[M12Blue]

I understand your point and the consequences of leaks. But I also understand that as he is fairly new to twitter/x although been involved in journalism for a very long time, there's maybe perhaps an opportunity to build a reputation beyond what's held on Bluemoon.

I guess what I'm trying to say is, the posts are so vague that the only purpose which they are serving is to get people talking, tying in with the point I made about building reputation.

If this hearing is as watertight as it's made out to be which by all accounts it is, I'd have doubts as to how far down any information would filter. I suspect only a very very small, select group of people who are very high up at the club will know.

I’m guessing Tolms guy has simply confirmed all over and fuck all in it. No specifics as been watertight.
The big question is how in the know is Tolms guy.

 

[KS55]

It will go back to Sportswashing and human right abuses in UAE. We’ll never win them over.

We don’t need to, we out box them every time we win a trophy.

 

[pudge]

And possibly severe criticism of the PL and the Redshirts. When I mentioned this a while ago, Tolmie gave me a like. A clue?

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

Are you on twitter mate?
If you are, go on Tolmies feed and read the tweet where he put his cards on the table and told everyone who he is and what he's about.

He didn't have to but the idiots calling him out for talking bullshit and questioning him was getting boring so he decided to shut them up.

Personally he's connected me with a couple of people from the club when I needed to, he's the real deal for me.

So for him to come out with this tweet means he's been told some serious shit.

Thank you. I have been told in recent days even the owner has gone in to bat!

 

[Eric Hitchmough]

Thank you. I have been told in recent days even the owner has gone in to bat!

Do you anticipate a verdict around Jan/Feb/March mate?

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

Do you anticipate a verdict around Jan/Feb/March mate?

That's what Pep thinks. It's a fairly good bet, certainly with a case as long as this for summing up.