The Graun published an article post CAS suggesting we were guilty and managed not to mention “There is no evidence that…”Ok, if you say so pal.
(In a 'fair enough you know more so I believe that' way, rather than sarcastic dismissal, just for clarity).
A part of me can see a verdict that is muddy and open to interpretation, like finding we commited 'technical breaches' but did not outright deceive or inflate revenue etc.
But then, the CAS verdict was pretty unambiguous (MCFC did not disguise funding), and our media still found ways to interpret that disingenuously, so doesn't really matter I guess, it will be muddy and go on for a long time yet regardless.
Last edited: