PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

[KS55]

If you were saying City had been cleared of all charges it would be the same. If you turn out to be correct it will be coincidence because you can’t look into the future.

You could say you have heard City will beat Salford in the FA Cup and you might be correct but does that mean you knew in advance or, more likely, that you are mad?

Corrected in the light of our current form.

 

[Damocles]

Is it Sunday though? In Druidic times there used to be 13 month years each of 28 days which fits better with lunation cycles. Who knows what day it is?

This is all Caesar's fault

 

[KS55]

I was out last night at a "do".
One of the lads who's very well connected to a bloke he sometimes sees in the pub said that the rumour of 40 points is bollocks.
Closer to 30, his contact told him.

I was baby sitting my grandchildren last night. Maddy, aged 12 months,
told me :“Cit goo gah goo.” She knows.

 

[salfordbluetrue]

You can appeal to the Swiss courts but only on very narrow grounds.

i do not believe that was who i thought, and since i can not remember, it is pretty much redundant, we are well past that point anyway.

 

[Stoned Rose]

Thread has gone absolutely fucking diabolical due to various knobs posting “I’ve heard” type nonsense.

There needs to be a rule that any “I’ve heard” posts need to removed immediately unless the source is named, actually connected and actually reliable.

 

[feedmpenzaandhewillscore]

we now have time travellers invading the thread informing us of our impending doom they heard from a bloke in year 2078. We still don’t have a proper left back in the future neither.

 

[salfordbluetrue]

I was baby sitting my grandchildren last night. Maddy, aged 12 months,
told me :“Cit goo gah goo.” She knows.

Translate please, are City in the Goo or out of it? :)

 

[Eric Hitchmough]

Thread has gone absolutely fucking diabolical due to various knobs posting “I’ve heard” type nonsense.

There needs to be a rule that any “I’ve heard” posts need to removed immediately unless the source is named, actually connected and actually reliable.

If that rule is implemented prepare yourself for 200 pages of the muffin vs barm debate :)

 

[cheekybids]

It’s funny how things completely unrelated to the charges, the evidence provided can all of a sudden cause panic about a case the club are super confident of defending.

The season is 38 games, we’ve been hit with horrendous injuries, fatigue & poor performance. We’ve got 21 games to find form to rescue our season which maybe a cup & a champions league spot but it will return.

In the meantime I’ll leave you with the following…..

We defeated UEFA at CAS
We exposed the premier league for being unlawful, unlawful, unlawful, unreasonable, unreasonable & unfair, unfair at the ATP overturning the recent rule changes.

In all of these prior, during & after the media has changed the narrative. It’s just shit press we will prevail.

Now after we get our decision on the ATP then we’ll be cleared of this shenanigans we’ll have found form & become a winning machine. Possibly to late to win the title but that will leave infighting with the cartel cunts because someone will lose out & they can’t blame us.

 

[Cityfan1977]

Reminder