PL Clubs vote against anchoring but vote for SCR

Have City decided to become one of the cartel and fuck every one else by putting rules in to make sure we're ok and another team can't come along and break up the arrangement?

Give it a couple of years and we'll vote for the draft system to replace transfer fees, along with no relegation and playing both Derbies in Tampa.
"AND ITS LIVE !"
 
The devil is in the detail with this SCR. It looks like they've snuck in am only "football generated operations revenue" will count as turnover whereas Uefa don't give a monkeys where the revenue comes from. So comparison to Uefa's 85% is pointless as they are measuring completely different things. This is ambigious enough to fuck teams over if the PL wants to. How do you even define football operations anymore? is a hotel, co-op live, website etc counted as revenue anymore? very vague.
 
Is this all for show just to keep any regulator at arms length and show “look we are doing something, we are getting our own house in order, you don’t need to bother with us” etc?
 
This?
"Think of it this way. Every club will start next season on 85% + 30% allowance, so effectively 115%.
Any clubs that spend above 85% will face a fine, but they would need to be in excess of 115% lose points."


Yep,
The new rules...

"An assessment is made each March, and the allowance is crucial to determine possible sporting sanctions applied in the same season.

The 85% marker is known as the Green Threshold. Spend above that and you get a financial penalty, although this will be far less punitive than Uefa.

The Red Threshold is 85% plus the allowance. Go beyond that, and it's a fixed six-point deduction which increases by one point for every £6.5m spent over the Red Threshold.

Think of it this way. Every club will start next season on 85% + 30% allowance, so effectively 115%.

Any clubs that spend above 85% will face a fine, but they would need to be in excess of 115% lose points."



115%
That's what they have decided on.
You really could not make this shit up hahaha
 
The devil is in the detail with this SCR. It looks like they've snuck in am only "football generated operations revenue" will count as turnover whereas Uefa don't give a monkeys where the revenue comes from. So comparison to Uefa's 85% is pointless as they are measuring completely different things. This is ambigious enough to fuck teams over if the PL wants to. How do you even define football operations anymore? is a hotel, co-op live, website etc counted as revenue anymore? very vague.

UEFA very much care where the revenue comes from and it's comprehensively defined - it's the PL who are playing catch up on that. And I can only imagine the PL's version is also very carefully defined after the trouble they got themselves into with their poorly defined PSR rules. Also UEFA is 70% not 85.
 
The devil is in the detail with this SCR. It looks like they've snuck in am only "football generated operations revenue" will count as turnover whereas Uefa don't give a monkeys where the revenue comes from. So comparison to Uefa's 85% is pointless as they are measuring completely different things. This is ambigious enough to fuck teams over if the PL wants to. How do you even define football operations anymore? is a hotel, co-op live, website etc counted as revenue anymore? very vague.
Hotel room included as free within the price of your match ticket
 
Last edited:
As a know nowt I don't see this harming City, we are in Europe and they have a 70% cap.
Can the clever ones on here tell me if it could/will harm us please.
 
UEFA very much care where the revenue comes from and it's comprehensively defined - it's the PL who are playing catch up on that. And I can only imagine the PL's version is also very carefully defined after the trouble they got themselves into with their poorly defined PSR rules. Also UEFA is 70% not 85.
Uefa don't really care, you can sell assets to yourself without any issues as they stick to proper international accountancy rules. So teams like Chelsea, Barcelona and ourselves have benefited over this arrangement for some time as it's a legitimate business transaction. The PL can now say this is not football related so all of that revenue would disappear for the calculations. Different formula so different result you can quite easily pass the Uefa test but fail the PL one
 
After reading 5 pages I still want to know does this fuck the dippers up for spending half a billion in 1 window?
 
Now we know how the cartel clubs were able to spent nearly a billion between them in the summer.

Although it suits us, but imagine being a fan of the clubs trying to break into the top 4 & knowing that youve got no hope of keeping a star player. With the previous guises you could at least speculate & hope that you could break even after 3 years in line with ffp/psr & thats before you look at the rags being in debt but able to outspend due to their revenues.
 
Have City decided to become one of the cartel and fuck every one else by putting rules in to make sure we're ok and another team can't come along and break up the arrangement?

Give it a couple of years and we'll vote for the draft system to replace transfer fees, along with no relegation and playing both Derbies in Tampa.
Sheikh M most certainly bought City as an investment.

Whilst battling against a red cartel dominated PL he appears to be on a Crusade for fairness only but rest assured he only wants rule changes that benefit the City Business Plan.

Anything wrong with voting for things that will further his investment?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top