the problem that ive always had is with the term fair market value, no independent body can or should be able to set a market value, the market sets the value, could you imagine if an outside body just arbitrarily decided that all houses were to expensive and they were taking 20% of the value off them all, there would rightfully be outrage.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL set to introduce ban on incoming loans between associated party clubs
- Thread starter Moss Side's Finest
- Start date
HaalandEffect
Well-Known Member
So no loans to Troyes, Lommel, Bahia, Girona?
I'm confused whether this is loans inbound to MCFC or also outbound from MCFC to other CFG teams?So no loans to Troyes, Lommel, Bahia, Girona?
ganganvince
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Oct 2014
- Messages
- 6,671
Think it's just inbound so we could loan to CFG clubs but not from.I'm confused whether this is loans inbound to MCFC or also outbound from MCFC to other CFG teams?
Hoghead
Well-Known Member
Which clubs do you think will vote against this proposal?
Us
Newcastle
Everton?
Wolves?
?
?
Us
Newcastle
Everton?
Wolves?
?
?
BeerIsTheBest
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 Oct 2018
- Messages
- 1,969
Members in a club bound by the rules of the club! Any Club rules are fractured by knee jerk reactions to specific circumstances - which in this case is obviously pressured by the istry boys worried about next seasons Euro comp monies.
Similar to the multiple and constant changes to things like hand ball rules and offside, chaos and challenge will follow. And for sure some of the spiteful lot will see this move as a wedge to a gradual tightening of everything around multi club ownership like ours.
Bring in the external Regulator and roll the dice on football oversight and stewardship I say. The current regime is poison.
Similar to the multiple and constant changes to things like hand ball rules and offside, chaos and challenge will follow. And for sure some of the spiteful lot will see this move as a wedge to a gradual tightening of everything around multi club ownership like ours.
Bring in the external Regulator and roll the dice on football oversight and stewardship I say. The current regime is poison.
I think it’s in bound to MCFC etc as they affect the PL. Out bound, the redshirts dont care.I'm confused whether this is loans inbound to MCFC or also outbound from MCFC to other CFG teams?
+ I understand Forest, Villa, Palace also have connections to clubs, so that may be 7 v 13, I think they need 14 to get a majority decision through.Which clubs do you think will vote against this proposal?
Us
Newcastle
Everton?
Wolves?
?
?
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
The redshirts need to know what was the losing bidthe problem that ive always had is with the term fair market value, no independent body can or should be able to set a market value, the market sets the value, could you imagine if an outside body just arbitrarily decided that all houses were to expensive and they were taking 20% of the value off them all, there would rightfully be outrage.
Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 16,357
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Its all inbound. Its also temporarty until they come up with something in the summer apparently.I'm confused whether this is loans inbound to MCFC or also outbound from MCFC to other CFG teams?
I dont mind it tbh, it doesnt affect City but tbh whats to stop Newcastle taking Ronaldo (for example) on loan. Seems sensible to me, despite the obvious attack on the new wealth clubs, they wouldnt be doing this if it were utd or any of the self proclaimed royalty