BlueMoonRisin’
Well-Known Member
Not looked at a porno mag in years. I think the difference in them nowadays is most tend to be shaven. Years ago, most women would pose with a fanny that resembled David Bellamy's beard.
Not looked at a porno mag in years. I think the difference in them nowadays is most tend to be shaven. Years ago, most women would pose with a fanny that resembled David Bellamy's beard.
I think it is for blokes who are court ordered not to use the internet.Last week in a local shop I noticed the top shelf was just as full as it would've been 20 years ago. I was shocked.
Ha bustedI think it is for blokes who are court ordered not to use the internet.
Not looked at a porno mag in years. I think the difference in them nowadays is most tend to be shaven. Years ago, most women would pose with a fanny that resembled David Bellamy's beard.
Once the change to the bald look started I had a housemate that used to scour shops for his favourite magazine "Furry Females."
Health & Efficiency anyone
Guilty!Ladies' underwear section of the Kays catalogue anyone?
I thought Playboy were going to start publishing naked ladies again?
Why would they stop in the beginning, anyway? To be PC?
Glad they've got their NUTS back!!
Ergh...I have no desire to see their nuts Bigga. Weirdo.
Hairy bushes and women with very small fake tits...prefered Razzle. A good honest British housewife jazz mag.
Who didnt like a Razzle romp, in which 5 or 6 women would stack themselves to be photoed from behind. Classic stuff that isnt seen these days sadly.
Razzle was fucking horrible. All the women looked like needed a bath. Men Only and Fiesta were my favourites.