I think you'll find it's against the CoC to say anything positive about Txiki. Let's just get on with blaming him for not getting the Messi deal done ;-)I agree. It's a part of football business that receives little attention, but I believe carries weight when City are considering importing a player. The character of the player is important, not only on the pitch but within the group. I personally have completely forgiven him for his change of heart. It's a difficult thing to change clubs, as we have seen with Sterling.
I have a very good feeling that he is going to surprise a lot of doubters. He strikes me as being the type that will rise to the challenge, and being a left footer will help tighten up our left hand side.
Once again excellent business by Txiki.
I took some paragraphs from the article: http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2892...t-sense-for-manchester-city?ICID=TP_TNM_ART_2I worry for him if we sign Pogba. If not he'll get plenty of opportunities.
I took some paragraphs from the article: http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2892...t-sense-for-manchester-city?ICID=TP_TNM_ART_2
"...The temptation is to suggest that Delph will be another Jack Rodwell or Scott Sinclair, a Brit consigned to the margins of a largely imported squad... but there are reasons to believe that he will not suffer the same fate. His body is more resilient than Rodwell’s and, at 25, he understands his game better. Sinclair, quite simply, was not good enough. Delph, in contrast, was one of comparatively few players to earn a regular berth in the England team when not employed at one of the elite clubs. It is a rare achievement.
Delph need not fear the competition. He should be neither automatic choice nor outcast. He stands a greater chance of establishing himself in the City midfield than he would at Chelsea, given the presence of Nemanja Matic and Cesc Fabregas, or Manchester United, considering the spending on Morgan Schneiderlin and Bastian Schweinsteiger. City offer his best opportunity of playing a significant number of games for a title challenger. To say no would either have been, as he claimed last week, a show of loyalty to Villa or an indication of a lack of faith in his own ability.
So this should be an excellent deal for two of the three parties involved: Delph and City. But not for Villa, losing their best midfielder as well as their finest defender, Ron Vlaar, and their outstanding forward, Christian Benteke. Delph's departure will be all the crueller for the false hope he gave them. Paragon will be pariah, leader will become loathed. It is the price that he will pay for changing his mind"
The most important thing Delph will offer in midfield is legs, Sky tweeted this yesterday, assuming its accurate this is a big improvement in our midfield.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Vlaar#Aston_Villa said:On 15 July 2012, Feyenoord confirmed that Vlaar had travelled to Birmingham to hold talks with Aston Villa manager Paul Lambert with a view to a possible transfer.[21] During Villa's pre-season tour of the United States, however, Vlaar admitted that the deal was off and he would remain with Feyenoord.[22] In another turn of events, it was then announced on 27 July that he would eventually be joining the Premier League side, as he had agreed personal terms and would sign for Villa subject to him passing a medical.
I think Maverick might still be confused why Arsenal offered £40m and a quid for Louis Suarez!
Delph had a buy out clause of £8m if a Champions League club came in for him, something i'm sure he asked for but Villa should of negotiated a higher fee with Delph when he signed a new contract.
Something i never get is why the scum are taking the piss comparing it to their swinestiger signing but werent they the ones signing ashley young a couple of seasons ago?