blumoonrisen
Well-Known Member
Why do you support City..?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Please answer this questions
- Thread starter blumoonrisen
- Start date
Egyptian said:As i just watched a little bit of 1 or 2 games while Mark Hughes was manager, i have watched all games since Mancini was appointed. Now to my questions:
Did City always throw away the first half under Hughes?
Why is Mancini so reluctant to put up an attacking starting line?
Why is Sunderlands home pitch an enclosed pasture?.
I have no idea what you are asking with that last question.
As for the others we are no better under Mancini than we were under Hughes. In fact I think we shot ourselves in the foot by changing manager. Two wins in eight games now. Hughes was sacked for similar form. We played well on the counter attack for 45 minutes at Chelsea but the first half was dire. We're going backwards.
masterwig said:As for the others we are no better under Mancini than we were under Hughes. In fact I think we shot ourselves in the foot by changing manager. Two wins in eight games now. Hughes was sacked for similar form. We played well on the counter attack for 45 minutes at Chelsea but the first half was dire. We're going backwards.
The points we've racked up since the change was made suggest otherwise.
Only a few (Rags, maybe Chelsea, maybe Everton) have done better than us since Christmas.
then youre on here why?Egyptian said:blumoonrises said:Why do you support City..?
I don't.
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
masterwig said:Egyptian said:As i just watched a little bit of 1 or 2 games while Mark Hughes was manager, i have watched all games since Mancini was appointed. Now to my questions:
Did City always throw away the first half under Hughes?
Why is Mancini so reluctant to put up an attacking starting line?
Why is Sunderlands home pitch an enclosed pasture?.
I have no idea what you are asking with that last question.
As for the others we are no better under Mancini than we were under Hughes. In fact I think we shot ourselves in the foot by changing manager. Two wins in eight games now. Hughes was sacked for similar form. We played well on the counter attack for 45 minutes at Chelsea but the first half was dire. We're going backwards.
are you actually being serious or joking?
glen quagmire
Well-Known Member
blumoonrises
egyptian
hahahahahaha blumoonrises! he got you there!
;-)
i guessed you were a rag Egyptian, from your kits in the fantasy kit maker thread!
Why do you support City..?
egyptian
I don't.
hahahahahaha blumoonrises! he got you there!
;-)
i guessed you were a rag Egyptian, from your kits in the fantasy kit maker thread!
law74
Well-Known Member
Egyptian said:As i just watched a little bit of 1 or 2 games while Mark Hughes was manager, i have watched all games since Mancini was appointed. Now to my questions:
Did City always throw away the first half under Hughes?
Why is Mancini so reluctant to put up an attacking starting line?
Why is Sunderlands home pitch an enclosed pasture?
I allso made the observation that Adam Johnson>SWP.
Ok I will try and answer the questions asked
1) No, we just went hell for leather to try and score more than the opposition and as a consequence had a woeful defence.
2) To build a successful side you need to be strong at the back, and away from home you need to win the right to play football, and as a prelude to number 3, you cannot play football on a ploughed field. So he changed things and brought on a targetman to allow us to go long when necessary.
I hope this helps (but am sure i will be ridiculed on here)