He didn't leave his foot, that would imply he was stationary. He's dragged his foot into the keeper, he's the one who initiated the contact, never a penalty.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Premier League Games 2/3/4/5/6/ May '24
- Thread starter kaz7
- Start date
half & half derby scarf
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Jun 2016
- Messages
- 938
Howard Webb preparing his apology script as we speak
Well everyone has different opinions. Let's leave it at that, Stockley Park aren't going to turn around and go 'hang on a minute guys, there are some alternative opinions on the Bluemoon forum, let's have a read and then take a decision'.You are joking?? No contact until that cheating **** Havertz drags his leg. Doesn’t anyone understand the game??
OrigamiNinja
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 9,618
Well that’s not what we were told when Walker got cleaned out against Chelsea and the ref gave a free kick to them.He left his foot there for the keeper to catch. Yes it's buying a penalty but if you make contact with the foot it remains a penalty whether you like the intention of the forward or not.
This is going to be controversial, but I think that should be a penalty. It's not the forward's responsibility to avoid the tackle. His legs go in the same direction as before the challenge, albeit dragging it across the ground. It would be different (cheating) if he put his leg outwards, like that famous Young dive for united.
Because everyone on the Arsenal forum is currently sucking each others' cocks. At least on here I can get a bit of banter and less myopic opinions.Yes thank fuck there’s no corruption. Thank fuck the premier league have never said it’s good for the brand for a different team to win the league. And what the fuck are you in a City form, when your own team is playing, at home? Sad
feelymcfeel
Well-Known Member
That was Havertz making contact with the keeper though, not the other way around.He left his foot there for the keeper to catch. Yes it's buying a penalty but if you make contact with the foot it remains a penalty whether you like the intention of the forward or not.
Same thing happened in the Clasico with Vazquez and in the rags dippers game with Elliott, both of them got pens despite cheating, only the ref from the Bayern Arsenal first leg didn't fall for that when Saka did it, but if you see them being given instead of being booked for simulation you'll do it and that's what the **** Havertz did, when the idiots stop giving pens for that and book the divers it will stop happening.
deano ou812
Well-Known Member
Yet we have players dragged down in the box and it’s waved away,cheating pure and simple and assistance from Ref and VAR to get the desired outcome a 100% win for arsenal..
Nonsense.He left his foot there for the keeper to catch. Yes it's buying a penalty but if you make contact with the foot it remains a penalty whether you like the intention of the forward or not.
If that’s the case why didn’t he get a penalty earlier?
Because he initiated the contact that’s why.