Not with 10 menFulham ‘could’ get something here.
The arse don’t look all that.
Not with 10 menFulham ‘could’ get something here.
The arse don’t look all that.
That aged badly in 10 secondsFulham ‘could’ get something here.
The arse don’t look all that.
Not with 10 men.Fulham ‘could’ get something here.
The arse don’t look all that.
True both seem correct however the thing is the rags got a leg up with the iffy equaliser (definition of interfering with play seems to differ at the swamp) which I have seen been disallowed before, much like the let off with the foul by the keeper the other week.Hahahaha you have to laugh a red card and a pen now for these chancers hahahaha of course ..
Arsenal are known to bottleNot with 10 men.
Protected like Harry Kane was.Exactly and I’ve not seen it but some on here think contact is enough for a penalty, no it isn’t, it should be a challenge that stops a player not just a feather of contact.
I'd of wanted that though.Do you honestly think that would be given at the other end? Be honest