heslops barnet
Well-Known Member
We’ll never know….If we had paid £100M for Kane this summer we would have seriously robbed ourselves.
We’ll never know….If we had paid £100M for Kane this summer we would have seriously robbed ourselves.
Don't think he ever had it.Spuds just walking, no movement. Is it to early to say he has lost the charging room ?
Name one.No a goalkeeper does not need to be good at passing. It's better if they can pass but even in recent years teams have had success with keepers who are notably limited with the ball at their feet.
Agree. He's alright and he would add value to our side but not at any more than about what we paid for Laporte or Dias. Grealish is young and the future, so worth it. Kane is not, and there was a Levy v City v England captain tariff on the fee. We shouldn't be paying more than 60m for him and he is worth that. Even next summer he would be. He has to drop into midfield for these. Left to striking for us the world could be his lobsterIf we had paid £100M for Kane this summer we would have seriously robbed ourselves.
I'm not specifically talking about Lloris though. I'm very clearly stating that a gk does not need to be particularly good at passing to be at a top level club.Name one.
I gave you the challenge lol.
They are VERY likely better than Lloris on the ball.
Kane's performances in the Euros never merited £130M. The £100M we reputedly offered was a genuine valuation based on his performance and age in 20/21. Since the start of this season you wouldn't rate him above the likes of Danny Ings for example. So I think we do know but prepared to wait until the end of the season to decide.We’ll never know….
They need to be competent at it, they don't need to be exceptional or anything like that.I'm not specifically talking about Lloris though. I'm very clearly stating that a gk does not need to be particularly good at passing to be at a top level club.