Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 61,248
Why wouldn’t it be? It stops an attack dead.Yeah, i hate it too. It's obviously encouraged by managers too
Why wouldn’t it be? It stops an attack dead.Yeah, i hate it too. It's obviously encouraged by managers too
It shouldn't tho refs can see if it's a serious Injury, not just a hand on the chest ffs the rule was supposed to be a serious head injuryWhy wouldn’t it be? It stops an attack dead.
Takes f…o…r…e…v…e…r for them to take any set piece.Too much time is wasted on setting up these free kicks
The ref thinks it’s a head injury, as he’s holding his face. The laws state the gsme needs stopping for head injuries.It shouldn't tho refs can see if it's a serious Injury, not just a hand on the chest ffs the rule was supposed to be a serious head injury
It ruins the game i love but they know refs can't take the chance with 'head' injuries.Why wouldn’t it be? It stops an attack dead.
Free kicks outside the box take too much time in general, but I agree, Arsenal make any set pieces into a paint-watching sessionTakes f…o…r…e…v…e…r for them to take any set piece.
That would end up with players hiding head injuries though and the game would get pelters for that.It ruins the game i love but they know refs can't take the chance with 'head' injuries.
Players going down holding their head should have to leave the field for concussion protocols
Hockey have an embellishment penalty. Refs can use the flexible unsporting behavior to yellow card players who seek to play the refereeThe ref thinks it’s a head injury, as he’s holding his face. The laws state the gsme needs stopping for head injuries.
I don’t see an easy solution to fix the issue. You don’t want players hiding hesd injuries either.